From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752636AbeEGTGX (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2018 15:06:23 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:23314 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751976AbeEGTGW (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2018 15:06:22 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,375,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="222348471" Subject: Re: [V5 PATCH] perf parse-events: Specially handle uncore event alias in small groups To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa , mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com, zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com, yao.jin@linux.intel.com, will.deacon@arm.com, ak@linux.intel.com, agustinv@codeaurora.org References: <1525185096-13477-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> <20180501163340.GB11539@krava> <1c2fc5c1-2ad1-8caf-eac6-f08b5f42d7fc@linux.intel.com> <20180504182116.GA32709@kernel.org> <20180507183930.GA13491@kernel.org> From: "Liang, Kan" Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 15:06:18 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180507183930.GA13491@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/7/2018 2:39 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:21:16PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: >> Em Fri, May 04, 2018 at 01:57:33PM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu: >>> On 5/1/2018 12:33 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote: >>>> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa > >>> Thanks Jirka. > >>> Are you OK with the patch? >>> It looks like Jirka has another patch which will touch the same code. >>> If it's OK for you, could you please merge the patch? So he can do the >>> changes on top of this patch. > >> Yeah, I'm applying to my perf/core branch and pushing it out now. > > So, this will probably break when merging with perf/urgent due to the > revert of a patch that touches the parser files, just a heads out. > Yes, it probably be a conflict. Do you want me to send a re-base version of this patch after the revert? Thanks, Kan