From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Add pud_sect_supported()
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 10:42:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f268e345-1e07-54af-619f-7853c706fe0d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YUNt3btNlYVGDTkX@arm.com>
On 9/16/21 9:46 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 09:14:19AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> index 23505fc35324..641854f0e8ee 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> @@ -40,11 +40,10 @@ void __init arm64_hugetlb_cma_reserve(void)
>> {
>> int order;
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES
>> - order = PUD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT;
>> -#else
>> - order = CONT_PMD_SHIFT + PMD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT;
>> -#endif
>> + if (pud_sect_supported())
>> + order = PUD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT;
>> + else
>> + order = CONT_PMD_SHIFT + PMD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT;
>> /*
>> * HugeTLB CMA reservation is required for gigantic
>> * huge pages which could not be allocated via the
>> @@ -62,8 +61,9 @@ bool arch_hugetlb_migration_supported(struct hstate *h)
>> size_t pagesize = huge_page_size(h);
>>
>> switch (pagesize) {
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES
>> +#ifndef __PAGETABLE_PUD_FOLDED
>> case PUD_SIZE:
>> + return pud_sect_supported();
>> #endif
>> case PMD_SIZE:
>> case CONT_PMD_SIZE:
>
> Is this the same thing? With 4K pages and 3-levels (39-bit VA), the PUD
No. These huge page sizes are different at each level for the above config.
Seems like the SOFT_OFFLINE based HugeTLB migration test, which I normally
run for all HugeTLB related changes some how missed this particular config
(4K|39V|48PA) where it mattered.
> is folded but we do have a valid PUD_SIZE == PGDIR_SIZE and different
> from PMD_SIZE. Do we disallow section mappings at the top level in this
> case? If not, we should have check for __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED instead.
Right, should dont disallow such PUD_SIZE which is different from PMD_SIZE.
Will replace the check with __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED.
>
>> @@ -126,8 +126,11 @@ static inline int num_contig_ptes(unsigned long size, size_t *pgsize)
>> *pgsize = size;
>>
>> switch (size) {
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES
>> +#ifndef __PAGETABLE_PUD_FOLDED
>> case PUD_SIZE:
>> + if (pud_sect_supported())
>> + contig_ptes = 1;
>> + break;
>> #endif
>> case PMD_SIZE:
>> contig_ptes = 1;
>
> Same here.
Sure, will change.
>
>> @@ -489,9 +492,9 @@ void huge_ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>
>> static int __init hugetlbpage_init(void)
>> {
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES
>> - hugetlb_add_hstate(PUD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
>> -#endif
>> + if (pud_sect_supported())
>> + hugetlb_add_hstate(PUD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
>> +
>> hugetlb_add_hstate(CONT_PMD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
>> hugetlb_add_hstate(PMD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
>> hugetlb_add_hstate(CONT_PTE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
>> @@ -503,8 +506,9 @@ arch_initcall(hugetlbpage_init);
>> bool __init arch_hugetlb_valid_size(unsigned long size)
>> {
>> switch (size) {
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES
>> +#ifndef __PAGETABLE_PUD_FOLDED
>> case PUD_SIZE:
>> + return pud_sect_supported();
>> #endif
>> case CONT_PMD_SIZE:
>> case PMD_SIZE:
>
> And here.
Sure, will change.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-17 5:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-15 3:44 [PATCH] arm64/mm: Add pud_sect_supported() Anshuman Khandual
2021-09-16 16:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-09-17 5:12 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f268e345-1e07-54af-619f-7853c706fe0d@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox