public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander H Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
To: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
	Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: page_pool: fix refcounting issues with fragmented allocation
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 07:57:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3d079ce930895475f307de3fdaed0b85b4f2671.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC_iWjKAEgUB8Z3WNNVgUK8omXD+nwt_VPSVyFn1i4EQzJadog@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 16:11 +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> Hi Felix,
> 
> ++cc Alexander and Yunsheng.
> 
> Thanks for the report
> 
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 14:43, Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name> wrote:
> > 
> > While testing fragmented page_pool allocation in the mt76 driver, I was able
> > to reliably trigger page refcount underflow issues, which did not occur with
> > full-page page_pool allocation.
> > It appears to me, that handling refcounting in two separate counters
> > (page->pp_frag_count and page refcount) is racy when page refcount gets
> > incremented by code dealing with skb fragments directly, and
> > page_pool_return_skb_page is called multiple times for the same fragment.
> > 
> > Dropping page->pp_frag_count and relying entirely on the page refcount makes
> > these underflow issues and crashes go away.
> > 
> 
> This has been discussed here [1].  TL;DR changing this to page
> refcount might blow up in other colorful ways.  Can we look closer and
> figure out why the underflow happens?
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1625903002-31619-4-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com/
> 
> Thanks
> /Ilias
> 
> 

The logic should be safe in terms of the page pool itself as it should
be holding one reference to the page while the pp_frag_count is non-
zero. That one reference is what keeps the two halfs in sync as the
page shouldn't be able to be freed until we exhaust the pp_frag_count.

To have an underflow there are two possible scenarios. One is that
either put_page or free_page is being called somewhere that the
page_pool freeing functions should be used. The other possibility is
that a pp_frag_count reference was taken somewhere a page reference
should have.

Do we have a backtrace for the spots that are showing this underrun? If
nothing else we may want to look at tracking down the spots that are
freeing the page pool pages via put_page or free_page to determine what
paths these pages are taking.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-24 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-24 12:43 [PATCH] net: page_pool: fix refcounting issues with fragmented allocation Felix Fietkau
2023-01-24 14:11 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-01-24 15:57   ` Alexander H Duyck [this message]
2023-01-24 16:59     ` Felix Fietkau
2023-01-26 10:31     ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-01-26 15:41       ` Alexander Duyck
2023-01-26 16:05         ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-01-24 17:22   ` Felix Fietkau
2023-01-24 21:10     ` Alexander H Duyck
2023-01-24 21:30       ` Felix Fietkau
2023-01-25 17:11         ` Alexander H Duyck
2023-01-25 17:32           ` Felix Fietkau
2023-01-25 18:26             ` Alexander H Duyck
2023-01-25 18:42               ` Felix Fietkau
2023-01-25 19:02                 ` Alexander H Duyck
2023-01-25 19:10                   ` Felix Fietkau
2023-01-25 19:40                     ` Felix Fietkau
2023-01-25 20:02                       ` Felix Fietkau
2023-01-25 22:14                       ` Alexander H Duyck
2023-01-26  6:12                         ` Felix Fietkau
2023-01-26  9:14                           ` Felix Fietkau
2023-01-26 16:08                             ` Alexander Duyck
2023-01-26 16:40                               ` Alexander Duyck
2023-01-26 17:44                               ` Felix Fietkau
2023-01-26 18:38                                 ` Alexander H Duyck
2023-01-26 18:43                                   ` Felix Fietkau
2023-01-26 19:06                                     ` [net PATCH] skb: Do mix page pool and page referenced frags in GRO Alexander Duyck
2023-01-26 19:14                                       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2023-01-26 19:48                                         ` Alexander Duyck
2023-01-26 21:35                                           ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2023-01-26 23:13                                       ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-27  7:15                                         ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-01-27  7:21                                         ` Felix Fietkau
2023-01-30 16:49                                         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-01-28  2:37                                       ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-01-28  5:26                                         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-28  7:08                                           ` Eric Dumazet
2023-01-30  8:50                                             ` Paolo Abeni
2023-01-30 16:17                                               ` Alexander Duyck
2023-01-28  7:15                                           ` Eric Dumazet
2023-01-28 17:08                                             ` Alexander Duyck
2023-01-28  7:50                                       ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-01-26 10:32     ` [PATCH] net: page_pool: fix refcounting issues with fragmented allocation Ilias Apalodimas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f3d079ce930895475f307de3fdaed0b85b4f2671.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox