Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] load_balance() fixes for affinity

[Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>]

On 6/13/2017 8:32 AM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On 6/7/2017 1:18 PM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>> Co-authored-by: Austin Christ <austinwc@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> [V5]
>> -updated comment to explain the "why" behind the redo check
>> -fixed panic triggered from active_load_balance_cpu_stop()
>>
>> [V4]
>> -restricted active cpus mask to the domain span
>> -fixed dst_cpu masking logic to work for the entire local group
>>
>> [V3]
>> -fixed botched subject lines
>>
>> [V2]
>> -Corrected use of Signed-off-by tags
>> -Removed temp cpumask variable from stack
>>
>> Jeffrey Hugo (2):
>>    sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path
>>    sched/fair: Remove group imbalance from calculate_imbalance()
>>
>>   kernel/sched/fair.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> Peter (and/or Ingo?), is this series likely to make 4.13?  V5 has been 
> quiet, so I'm not sure if folks are happy with things, or just haven't 
> had time to review.
> 
> Thanks
> 

Ping?

-- 
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm 
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.