From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-99.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-99.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F57622A4F9 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 12:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.99 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736771240; cv=none; b=aXzOSQxbdX7crLt/h84uCV6d534MDbG+IIDLu+rx/R8DVXge0AbeVT9YpIU+RXpmkAhaR+9nj21YMDNA0vzGnak/ClukzBzlbpRKRLPfBUSOWFQSMbd0hdeiMQNsTF4UAZ0x9HyrjQDVH4qmAOzXl0cWTu4TG0dSm2d/hZDe8rs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736771240; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QHbaQ39N35Vtp/35NFfoToxtuxf5Lv4P24kXroKHoig=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=jCDTtpWIETG7U6c/xJ8Cs/iHaBNVZzoX9Y9w2SKdVvegW223ZUoPeBSr7NPeBnLoIYyQCdhcMRC6SHj5tleHizRHcVR6+hTIbP4QaOEDp2Xv34I+r7X4r+y8WiqrSmB03Rg7d4eB8mh3d3MtnWOR0IM4rPp2P13+VyHJLdZfe8A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=ZC29eWc0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.99 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="ZC29eWc0" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1736771235; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type; bh=0s2YgQyBsjXF2Fag5d2G70fgzqcjiMvY/FXNku923b0=; b=ZC29eWc0yQousTi2KaJbcjElpOn8XRGnvM3lJeJ+yZOKJMmK4x5wK5pCFefgN1xXIx/kqISAW1GyA2mG2CyNA3ErDP+Y+7rmIskKMiS3YxCK3UzH+XNzmG0DtEOadCXnIYJ5D8BwpUqbg+1/JLZfv5YpRVHzXWDZB5DmolGgUHo= Received: from 30.15.242.227(mailfrom:baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0WNYPAQs_1736771233 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 20:27:14 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 20:27:13 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] mm/hugetlb: rename folio_putback_active_hugetlb() to folio_putback_hugetlb() To: David Hildenbrand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Muchun Song , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" References: <20250110182149.746551-1-david@redhat.com> <20250110182149.746551-5-david@redhat.com> From: Baolin Wang In-Reply-To: <20250110182149.746551-5-david@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2025/1/11 02:21, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Now that folio_putback_hugetlb() is only called on folios that were > previously isolated through folio_isolate_hugetlb(), let's rename it to > match folio_putback_lru(). > > Add some kernel doc to clarify how this function is supposed to be used. > > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Yes, makes sense. Thanks. Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang