Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: pciehp: Add dmi table for in-band presence disabled

[Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>]

On 10/21/19 8:47 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:32:56PM -0400, Stuart Hayes wrote:
>> Some systems have in-band presence detection disabled for hot-plug PCI
>> slots, but do not report this in the slot capabilities 2 (SLTCAP2) register.
>> On these systems, presence detect can become active well after the link is
>> reported to be active, which can cause the slots to be disabled after a
>> device is connected.
>>
>> Add a dmi table to flag these systems as having in-band presence disabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
>> index 02eb811a014f..4d377a2a62ce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>>  
>>  #define dev_fmt(fmt) "pciehp: " fmt
>>  
>> +#include <linux/dmi.h>
>>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>  #include <linux/types.h>
>>  #include <linux/jiffies.h>
>> @@ -26,6 +27,16 @@
>>  #include "../pci.h"
>>  #include "pciehp.h"
>>  
>> +static const struct dmi_system_id inband_presence_disabled_dmi_table[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		.ident = "Dell System",
>> +		.matches = {
>> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_OEM_STRING, "Dell System"),
> 
> Sorry if this has been discussed previously already but isn't this going
> to apply on all Dell systems, not just the affected ones? Is this the
> intention?
> 

Yes, that is the intention. Applying this just makes the hotplug code wait for 
the presence detect bit to be set before proceeding, which ideally wouldn't hurt 
anything--for devices that don't have inband presence detect disabled, presence
detect should already be up when the code in patch 2/3 starts to wait for it.

The only issue should be with broken hotplug implementations that don't ever 
bring presence detect active (these apparently exist)--but even those would still 
work, they would just take an extra second to come up.

On the other hand, a number of Dell systems have (and will have) NVMe 
implementations that have inband presence detect disabled (but they won't have
the new bit implemented to report that), and they don't work correctly without 
this.