From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: sgarzare@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
eperezma@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, Yiqi Sun <sunyiqixm@gmail.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsock/virtio: fix vsockmon info leak in non-linear tap copy
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 12:26:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f4e52dcd-59ba-4c2e-9936-49cf27528b21@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430071110.380509-1-sunyiqixm@gmail.com>
On 4/30/26 9:11 AM, Yiqi Sun wrote:
> vsockmon mirrors packets through virtio_transport_build_skb(), which
> builds a new skb and copies the payload into it. For non-linear skbs,
> this goes through virtio_transport_copy_nonlinear_skb().
>
> Helper manually initializes a iov_iter, but leaves iov_iter.count unset.
> As a result, skb_copy_datagram_iter() sees zero writable bytes
> in the destination iterator and copies no payload data.
>
> This becomes an info leak because virtio_transport_build_skb() has
> already reserved payload_len bytes in the new skb with skb_put(). The
> skb is then returned to the tap path with that payload area still
> uninitialized, so userspace reading from a vsockmon device can observe
> heap contents and potentially kernel address.
>
> Fix it by initializing iov_iter.count to the number of bytes to copy.
>
> Fixes: 4b0bf10eb077 ("vsock/virtio: non-linear skb handling for tap")
> Signed-off-by: Yiqi Sun <sunyiqixm@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> index 416d533f493d..6b26ee57ccab 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static void virtio_transport_copy_nonlinear_skb(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> iov_iter.nr_segs = 1;
>
> to_copy = min_t(size_t, len, skb->len);
> -
> + iov_iter.count = to_copy;
> skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset,
> &iov_iter, to_copy);
@Stefano, @Stefan, the patch LGTM, but sashiko pointed out to a
pre-existing issue you should probably want to address:
> to_copy = min_t(size_t, len, skb->len);
Does this length calculation account for the offset when a packet is
split across multiple transmissions?
If a packet is requeued, VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset is increased,
but to_copy still evaluates to the full length of the skb.
/P
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 7:11 [PATCH] vsock/virtio: fix vsockmon info leak in non-linear tap copy Yiqi Sun
2026-04-30 13:04 ` Luigi Leonardi
2026-05-05 10:26 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-05-05 12:44 ` Stefano Garzarella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f4e52dcd-59ba-4c2e-9936-49cf27528b21@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=sunyiqixm@gmail.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox