From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0135FC433FE for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236305AbiDNPuS (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2022 11:50:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56804 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1352538AbiDNPku (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2022 11:40:50 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2FBDA0B3 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 08:20:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1649949642; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=64iwfqlvvcwkVV5nuqa1Iklmprqi6kfS6cUNegnWB6U=; b=BsV7ZsDn10oGhJQS+UrIw5p9Yx/oC3XrRAflCzFmu1NQFrX38czODAo1VVUc3pcCfSlNnJ RMggM5WAyI+VeX3m8szCEWeMe+uY1RqyHISU6S4s8wrYKMHN29EC+S7IfARug/IDsHGkAh 8YXJhIr+VZ0wyRjiJmBCurtQ895Dkog= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-12-wCArkRvZNkGAAxr3yJI33Q-1; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 11:20:33 -0400 X-MC-Unique: wCArkRvZNkGAAxr3yJI33Q-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id i184-20020a1c3bc1000000b0038e4c5968b5so4688018wma.0 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 08:20:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=64iwfqlvvcwkVV5nuqa1Iklmprqi6kfS6cUNegnWB6U=; b=r3QzJtkwtlpCynphR69h8trOEwW/bqnCtQypGLq37HniJLdLDKMhB1ppZws3C9TwAt u8nixe+bUvowmEi/GlFWemWbUK343JdxLH+taRXo7XvopGesRXe9a5eEfDSuly3gQ79v My6uSNVSyXerkUDJLQxnYBTePqht+F0eJO/Tg67RvbmAvUr+YH8x1LquHFGj2cZYEJP5 qeqgg/X0sNrEpo9IP9Ly0OcX8dfcdU4lnAR3g2fNFrB3ELWQ3Bg4HRE9nMn0XsA09npP KQkv3CAJVfSyXi0KTXeO64hwVuzy6pR5El5+K0pJs6s9qQ75bwHLq939lktPcX2Qch4J buYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5321IxjbMonWeHNhZ1yojH4XgfNZVzai+BqDgK49rpPZIbJe2V3z FLVo6GnerQHYj9qgxRYIeTr3Y3cnZlo5TbfZp/vxcmQqBi+8chLgq3TdW/DABwR/1kE22wJf3+r Q2GARXs0mMpx0Nb9edZLmpaTr X-Received: by 2002:adf:f44d:0:b0:207:b33f:ea7b with SMTP id f13-20020adff44d000000b00207b33fea7bmr2460565wrp.628.1649949632202; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 08:20:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz28lZEMTJTb47EK9BNZSqS459NBUwBeb5BJhEgjG6VLFN5Y0XBH7mSIlwX3WKRvFNLHP3QEw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f44d:0:b0:207:b33f:ea7b with SMTP id f13-20020adff44d000000b00207b33fea7bmr2460559wrp.628.1649949632011; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 08:20:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u1-20020a056000038100b00207a578e9d4sm2054623wrf.89.2022.04.14.08.20.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Apr 2022 08:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 17:20:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: selftests: Fix cut-off of addr_gva2gpa lookup Content-Language: en-US To: Peter Xu , Sean Christopherson Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Gardon , David Matlack , Andrew Jones References: <20220414010703.72683-1-peterx@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/14/22 17:05, Peter Xu wrote: > > So sadly it's only gcc that's not working properly with the bitfields.. at > least in my minimum test here. Apparently both behaviors are allowed. Paolo