linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kgunda@codeaurora.org
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org,
	Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>,
	David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 11/12] spmi: pmic-arb: add support for HW version 5
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:50:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f57b973e7c87bcd9bf7f512a00977d27@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ce6e8a0816d6d9b0ade86d3592b4dca@codeaurora.org>

On 2017-08-18 16:43, kgunda@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2017-08-17 17:58, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 03:38:30PM +0530, kgunda@codeaurora.org wrote:
>>> The intention of this check is to avoid the access to the
>>> peripherals those are
>>> not owned by the current EE (APSS) and it is expected to return a
>>> failure if the
>>> peripheral that is not owned by the current EE is trying to be 
>>> accessed.
>> 
>> Thanks for the background of this check.
>> 
>>> Looks like you trying to access the GPIOs 0xc000 and 0xc100,
>>> which are owned by modem subsystem but not the APSS. That is why you
>>> seeing the failure for that.
>>> Please change the ownership of those GPIOs to APSS (id '0') if you
>>> are working on a non-modem device (APQ).
>> 
>> Yes, it's device apq8016-sbc, and the error message is like below.
>> 
>> [    1.317186] spmi spmi-0: PMIC arbiter version v2 (0x20010000)
>> [    1.324784] spmi spmi-0: failed to xlate sid = 0x0, periph = 0xc0,
>> irq = 0: ee=0 but owner=2
>> [    1.329430] spmi spmi-0: failed to xlate sid = 0x0, periph = 0xc0,
>> irq = 0: ee=0 but owner=2
>> [    1.337626] qcom-spmi-gpio: probe of
>> 200f000.spmi:pm8916@0:gpios@c000 failed with error -22
>> 
>> I see that 'qcom,ee' property of spmi_bus is already <0>.  Is that 
>> what
>> you mean by ownership of those GPIOs?
>> 
I do not mean that. The SPMI arbiter ownership register is programmed by 
the boot-loader,
where the actual ownership is set. The same is shown in the above logs 
as owner = 2.

>> The pm8916_gpio is working fine on apq8016-sbc device with the current
>> mainline kernel.  It's not good to break the existing device without
>> a very good.  IMO, we should get this fixed before the patch is 
>> merged.
>> 
>> Shawn
>> --
> 
> From the logs the ownership for these GPIOs is not assigned to the
> application processor but to another master. Considering this is a
> (apq8016-sbc) APSS only platform ideally the fix for this would be to
> update the ownership table in the boot loader. The other option would
> be to make the  existing ownership check in SW optional for a platform
> via DT. I will push a patch shortly for this. Could you please give
> that a try.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kiran
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
>> linux-arm-msm" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-arm-msm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-18 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-28  7:10 [PATCH V2 00/12]: spmi: pmic-arb: Support for HW v5 and other fixes Kiran Gunda
2017-07-28  7:10 ` [PATCH V2 01/12] spmi: pmic-arb: remove the read/write access checks Kiran Gunda
2017-07-28  7:10 ` [PATCH V2 02/12] spmi: pmic-arb: rename pa_xx to pmic_arb_xx and other cleanup Kiran Gunda
2017-07-28  7:10 ` [PATCH V2 03/12] spmi: pmic-arb: clean up pmic_arb_find_apid function Kiran Gunda
2017-07-28  7:10 ` [PATCH V2 04/12] spmi: pmic-arb: optimize qpnpint_irq_set_type function Kiran Gunda
2017-07-28  7:10 ` [PATCH V2 05/12] spmi: pmic-arb: fix memory allocation for mapping_table Kiran Gunda
2017-07-28  7:10 ` [PATCH V2 06/12] spmi: pmic-arb: replace the writel_relaxed with __raw_writel Kiran Gunda
2017-07-28  7:10 ` [PATCH V2 07/12] spmi: pmic-arb: return the value instead of passing by pointer Kiran Gunda
2017-07-28  7:10 ` [PATCH V2 08/12] spmi: pmic-arb: use irq_chip callback to set spmi irq wakeup capability Kiran Gunda
2017-07-28  7:10 ` [PATCH V2 09/12] spmi: pmic-arb: return __iomem pointer instead of offset Kiran Gunda
2017-07-28  7:10 ` [PATCH V2 10/12] spmi: pmic-arb: fix a possible null pointer dereference Kiran Gunda
2017-07-28  7:10 ` [PATCH V2 11/12] spmi: pmic-arb: add support for HW version 5 Kiran Gunda
2017-08-17  7:41   ` Shawn Guo
2017-08-17 10:08     ` kgunda
2017-08-17 12:28       ` Shawn Guo
2017-08-18 11:13         ` kgunda
2017-08-18 11:20           ` kgunda [this message]
2017-08-18 13:22           ` Shawn Guo
2017-07-28  7:10 ` [PATCH V2 12/12] spmi: pmic-arb: Remove checking opc value not less than 0 Kiran Gunda
2017-08-01  4:55 ` [PATCH V2 00/12]: spmi: pmic-arb: Support for HW v5 and other fixes kgunda
2017-08-01 18:07   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f57b973e7c87bcd9bf7f512a00977d27@codeaurora.org \
    --to=kgunda@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=adharmap@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=collinsd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).