From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629E6C4338F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A3E6103B for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237475AbhG2Oic (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:38:32 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:49488 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237458AbhG2OiS (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:38:18 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0396D; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.6] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A8EE3F70D; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: WARNING: CPU: 112 PID: 2041 at kernel/sched/sched.h:1453 To: Bruno Goncalves Cc: CKI Project , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nathan@kernel.org, Memory Management , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: From: Dietmar Eggemann Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 16:38:10 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/07/2021 14:36, Bruno Goncalves wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 5:55 PM Dietmar Eggemann > wrote: >> >> On 28/07/2021 15:11, Bruno Goncalves wrote: [...] >> Can't reproduce it on my Juno (arm64) (slow-switching (scpi-cpufreq >> driver)). > > We seem to be able to reproduce this only on Ampere Altra machines, > specifically on mtjade and mtsnow cpus. > > # cpupower frequency-info > analyzing CPU 0: > driver: cppc_cpufreq > CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 > CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 0 > maximum transition latency: Cannot determine or is not supported. > hardware limits: 1000 MHz - 2.80 GHz > available cpufreq governors: conservative ondemand userspace > powersave performance schedutil > current policy: frequency should be within 2.00 GHz and 2.80 GHz. > The governor "schedutil" may decide which speed to use > within this range. > current CPU frequency: 1.55 GHz (asserted by call to hardware) > > # ps -eTo comm,pid,pri,class | grep sugov > sugov:0 1082 140 DLN > sugov:1 1085 140 DLN > ... > sugov:78 1319 140 DLN > sugov:79 1320 140 DLN Thanks! In the meantime I got access to an Ampere Altra so I can try 5.14.0-rc1 later today.