Re: [PATCH] Security: key: keyring: fix some code style issues

[Chihau Chau <chihau@gmail.com>]

Now I understand. Sorry for my little confusion.

I am making a new patch.

Thanks!

2010/3/9 James Kosin <jkosin@intcomgrp.com>:
> On 3/9/2010 12:39 PM, Chihau Chau wrote:
> Chau,
>
> Below is your original patch set.
>
> From: Chihau Chau <chihau@gmail.com>
>
> This fixes some code style issues like to include <linux/uaccess.h> instead
> <asm/uaccess.h> and to remove some innecessary braces.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chihau Chau <chihau@gmail.com>
> ---
>  security/keys/keyring.c |   11 ++++-------
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/keys/keyring.c b/security/keys/keyring.c
> index e814d21..5a44965 100644
> --- a/security/keys/keyring.c
> +++ b/security/keys/keyring.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <keys/keyring-type.h>
> -#include <asm/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  #include "internal.h"
>
>  /*
> @@ -170,12 +170,10 @@ static void keyring_describe(const struct key
> *keyring, struct seq_file *m)
>  {
>  	struct keyring_list *klist;
>
> -	if (keyring->description) {
> +	if (keyring->description)
>  		seq_puts(m, keyring->description);
> -	}
> -	else {
> +	else
>  		seq_puts(m, "[anon]");
> -	}
>
>
> Here is where I said NOT to remove the braces.  However you can see the
> style of the if() {} else {} blocks is not the same as below where you point
> to the style of the statements as to the reason for the change.
>
>
>  	rcu_read_lock();
>  	klist = rcu_dereference(keyring->payload.subscriptions);
> @@ -775,8 +773,7 @@ int __key_link(struct key *keyring, struct key *key)
>  		smp_wmb();
>  		klist->nkeys++;
>  		smp_wmb();
> -	}
> -	else {
> +	} else {
>  		/* grow the key list */
>  		max = 4;
>
>
> See HERE.
>
> 		if (klist)
> --
> 1.5.6.3
>
> One of these is wrong.  Check the coding style document as to which is
> correct.
>
> Sorry to be so critical.
>
> Regards,
> James K.
>



-- 
Chihau Chau