From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7527C2D0E4 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 01:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54780216C4 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 01:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="BYVvsXhx" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726101AbgKMBQR (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 20:16:17 -0500 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:60338 "EHLO aserp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725965AbgKMBQR (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 20:16:17 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0AD1E71w149332; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 01:16:07 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=8Rutt9Niok2qcRrHnnxztz8MDwQl7k5raBzLAndPrwk=; b=BYVvsXhxRJOlwvt7xqstWFOH51KQuGzgN9BTX7SaGuEWGOaAe0CUIbTxD3sqqOiG/gRi EcgQm74htkUkZ67RPknBa0vbKbaj/ir0y+8Za6X243EHCXc8d0jszw+nh3jCH7/+L9gu mUilftSnFVprJrXSNL2wP3LNwxZQnf2Uz1jbGn+cPCbe9BTAUQtZ15h8FpQs+LS3ASxJ KfN+26d2HZjGACBgPM63v9sXhjo786zvz957noJEVTevi4Nxk+DfTVWMsMOXsTFgg8h+ tB1zKSecN1tOKy7Gdvla5dc3yhwYGYqUhlJnVyy9swgCdzVt5ZykUvRYaBgN2xghLPlq sQ== Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 34nh3b8m2q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 01:16:07 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0AD15Kwb089759; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 01:14:06 GMT Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 34p55s6eba-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 01:14:06 +0000 Received: from abhmp0003.oracle.com (abhmp0003.oracle.com [141.146.116.9]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 0AD1E4nF030173; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 01:14:04 GMT Received: from [10.74.105.253] (/10.74.105.253) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:14:04 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: Kconfig: Drop ARM64 SoC specific configs To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Lokesh Vutla , Peter Ujfalusi , Yuti Amonkar , Santosh Shilimkar , Sekhar Nori , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jyri Sarha , Tero Kristo , Tomi Valkeinen , Swapnil Jakhade , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <20201026170624.24241-1-nm@ti.com> <20201026190808.im4nb32jn4rd3xhu@crayon> <20201112215600.npr4g24gt4tvc5tm@kahuna> <4b23cb5b-b1c9-34b9-2bdf-4f9c2df9ad0d@oracle.com> <20201112222242.hala5ocnrc43s6cs@scribing> From: santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com Organization: Oracle Corporation Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:13:58 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201112222242.hala5ocnrc43s6cs@scribing> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9803 signatures=668682 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2011130003 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9803 signatures=668682 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2011130004 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/12/20 2:22 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 13:59-20201112, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com wrote: >> On 11/12/20 1:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> On 14:08-20201026, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>>> On 23:30-20201026, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>>> [..] >>>>> ➜ linux git:(master) git grep -in ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC >>>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:961:CONFIG_ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC=y >>>>> drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig:7:config ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC >>>>> ➜ linux git:(master) git grep -in ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC >>>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:962:CONFIG_ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC=y >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/Kconfig:16: depends on ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC || >>>>> COMPILE_TEST >>>>> drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig:12:config ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I see drm bridge Kconfig is cleaned[0]. Please clean the defconfig as well. >>>>> >>>>> [0] >>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20201026165441.22894-1-nm@ti.com/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KWOx2aLl7hlHQrN--kiz1N5WaPWgeZzFZ12ptg8NzJE2BSnxxrWmsoqn5vjMvpfO1bSGYQ$ >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, the defconfig patches have to be queued up in a different queue, >>>> Lets see where the two patches fall and will post the defconfig >>>> updates as well. >>> >>> >>> Santosh, >>> >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20201026165441.22894-1-nm@ti.com/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KWOx2aLl7hlHQrN--kiz1N5WaPWgeZzFZ12ptg8NzJE2BSnxxrWmsoqn5vjMvpfO1bSGYQ$ >>> looks available in next now. >>> >>> Can we queue this patch[1] up for 5.11 window? >>> >>> Depending on your preference, I can carry the defconfig patch[2] (to >>> prevent merge dependencies, might be good to get an immutable tag) OR >>> you can pick the defconfig patch up that cleans after removing the >>> symbol. >>> >> >> I can apply SOC kconfig patch [1] to my soc branch. That branch with >> some additional patches am going to send up, so it should >> work. Let me know. > > OK, sounds fine to me, If you can give me a tag, I can add queue up > defconfig on top to prevent bisect issues. > I won't be adding tag till all the commits are lineup but branch will be immutable. Regards. Santosh