Re: [PATCH -next] [POWERPC] Rename get_property to of_get_property: use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock

["weiyongjun (A)" <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>]

Rename get_property to of_get_property: use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock

^^^^^^^^^

Please fix the module name in the patch subject.


> spinlock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_SPINLOCK()
>
>> rather than explicitly calling spin_lock_init().
>>
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-led.c | 4 +---
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-led.c 
>> b/drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-led.c
>> index ae067ab2373d..2502119cff42 100644
>> --- a/drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-led.c
>> +++ b/drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-led.c
>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/pmu.h>
>>   #include <asm/prom.h>
>>   -static spinlock_t pmu_blink_lock;
>> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pmu_blink_lock);
>>   static struct adb_request pmu_blink_req;
>>   /* -1: no change, 0: request off, 1: request on */
>>   static int requested_change;
>> @@ -105,8 +105,6 @@ static int __init via_pmu_led_init(void)
>>           return -ENODEV;
>>       }
>>       of_node_put(dt);
>> -
>> -    spin_lock_init(&pmu_blink_lock);
>>       /* no outstanding req */
>>       pmu_blink_req.complete = 1;
>>       pmu_blink_req.done = pmu_req_done;
>>