public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bruno Meneguele <bmeneg@redhat.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ima: limit secure boot feedback scope for appraise
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 17:07:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6b04ff269d3f5f72ee6b005bb97e6ac7b73b43e.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200904194100.761848-4-bmeneg@redhat.com>

Hi Bruno,

> +	bool sb_state = arch_ima_get_secureboot();
> +	int appraisal_state = ima_appraise;
>  
>  	if (strncmp(str, "off", 3) == 0)
> -		ima_appraise = 0;
> +		appraisal_state = 0;
>  	else if (strncmp(str, "log", 3) == 0)
> -		ima_appraise = IMA_APPRAISE_LOG;
> +		appraisal_state = IMA_APPRAISE_LOG;
>  	else if (strncmp(str, "fix", 3) == 0)
> -		ima_appraise = IMA_APPRAISE_FIX;
> +		appraisal_state = IMA_APPRAISE_FIX;
>  	else if (strncmp(str, "enforce", 7) == 0)
> -		ima_appraise = IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE;
> +		appraisal_state = IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE;
>  	else
>  		pr_err("invalid \"%s\" appraise option", str);
> +
> +	/* If appraisal state was changed, but secure boot is enabled,
> +	 * keep its default */
> +	if (sb_state) {
> +		if (!(appraisal_state & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE))
> +			pr_info("Secure boot enabled: ignoring ima_appraise=%s option",
> +				str);
> +		else
> +			ima_appraise = appraisal_state;
> +	}

Shouldn't the "else" clause be here.   No need to re-post the entire
patch set.

thanks,

Mimi

>  #endif
>  	return 1;
>  }



  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-04 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-04 19:40 [PATCH v2 0/4] integrity: improve user feedback for invalid bootparams Bruno Meneguele
2020-09-04 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ima: add check for enforced appraise option Bruno Meneguele
2020-09-04 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] integrity: invalid kernel parameters feedback Bruno Meneguele
2020-09-04 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ima: limit secure boot feedback scope for appraise Bruno Meneguele
2020-09-04 21:07   ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2020-09-05  1:17     ` Bruno Meneguele
2020-09-05  1:20   ` [PATCH v3 " Bruno Meneguele
2020-09-11 15:07     ` Mimi Zohar
2020-09-11 18:03       ` Bruno Meneguele
2020-09-04 19:41 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] integrity: prompt keyring name for unknown key request Bruno Meneguele

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f6b04ff269d3f5f72ee6b005bb97e6ac7b73b43e.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bmeneg@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox