From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bruno Meneguele <bmeneg@redhat.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ima: limit secure boot feedback scope for appraise
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 17:07:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6b04ff269d3f5f72ee6b005bb97e6ac7b73b43e.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200904194100.761848-4-bmeneg@redhat.com>
Hi Bruno,
> + bool sb_state = arch_ima_get_secureboot();
> + int appraisal_state = ima_appraise;
>
> if (strncmp(str, "off", 3) == 0)
> - ima_appraise = 0;
> + appraisal_state = 0;
> else if (strncmp(str, "log", 3) == 0)
> - ima_appraise = IMA_APPRAISE_LOG;
> + appraisal_state = IMA_APPRAISE_LOG;
> else if (strncmp(str, "fix", 3) == 0)
> - ima_appraise = IMA_APPRAISE_FIX;
> + appraisal_state = IMA_APPRAISE_FIX;
> else if (strncmp(str, "enforce", 7) == 0)
> - ima_appraise = IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE;
> + appraisal_state = IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE;
> else
> pr_err("invalid \"%s\" appraise option", str);
> +
> + /* If appraisal state was changed, but secure boot is enabled,
> + * keep its default */
> + if (sb_state) {
> + if (!(appraisal_state & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE))
> + pr_info("Secure boot enabled: ignoring ima_appraise=%s option",
> + str);
> + else
> + ima_appraise = appraisal_state;
> + }
Shouldn't the "else" clause be here. No need to re-post the entire
patch set.
thanks,
Mimi
> #endif
> return 1;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-04 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-04 19:40 [PATCH v2 0/4] integrity: improve user feedback for invalid bootparams Bruno Meneguele
2020-09-04 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ima: add check for enforced appraise option Bruno Meneguele
2020-09-04 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] integrity: invalid kernel parameters feedback Bruno Meneguele
2020-09-04 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ima: limit secure boot feedback scope for appraise Bruno Meneguele
2020-09-04 21:07 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2020-09-05 1:17 ` Bruno Meneguele
2020-09-05 1:20 ` [PATCH v3 " Bruno Meneguele
2020-09-11 15:07 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-09-11 18:03 ` Bruno Meneguele
2020-09-04 19:41 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] integrity: prompt keyring name for unknown key request Bruno Meneguele
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f6b04ff269d3f5f72ee6b005bb97e6ac7b73b43e.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bmeneg@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox