Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add TI tps6598x DT binding and probe

[Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>]

On 08/05/2020 15:22, Angus Ainslie wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2020-05-08 07:01, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:47:31PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>> V2:
>>> - Put myself down as sole schema maintainer as suggested - Andy
>>> - Fixed whitespace typo - Andy
>>> - Removed ifdef and of_match_ptr() - Andy
>>>
>>> V1:
>>> This simple series adds DT binding yaml and a DT lookup table for the
>>> tps6598x.
>>>
>>> Its possible to use i2c id_table to match the 'compatible = 
>>> "ti,tps6598x"
>>> and probe that way, however I think it is worthwhile adding a 
>>> specific OF
>>> way of doing it and having an accompanying yaml as an example.
>>>
>>> Bryan O'Donoghue (2):
>>>   dt-bindings: usb: Add TI tps6598x device tree binding documentation
>>>   usb: typec: tps6598x: Add OF probe binding
>>>
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml  | 64 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  drivers/usb/typec/tps6598x.c                  |  7 ++
>>>  2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml
>>
>> There was already a series from Angus [1] for this. The bindings
>> looked a bit different, but I think we should use these, because in
>> the DT bindings from Angus there appeared to be definitions for OF
>> graph that was not used. Or maybe I got it wrong?
>>
> 
> I was trying to include optional components but was not sure of the 
> syntax so that might have been wrong.
> 
>> Angus, is it OK if we use these patches instead the ones from you?
>>
> 
> Yeah these ones will work great for what we need.
> 
> Sorry Bryan I didn't realize there was a patch already in progress.
> 
> @Bryan, I'm going to send up some extcon patches for the tps6598x soon 
> but maybe I should check and make sure you don't already have anything 
> planned there.
> 
> It still needs to be retested after cleaning up but it's the top 9 
> patches here:
> 
> https://source.puri.sm/angus.ainslie/linux-next/-/commits/next/extcon

Makes me glad I didn't try to touch the PDO stuff :)

That series looks fine to me.

The only other modification I have is here.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20200507215938.1983363-2-bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org/T/#u

which is about data-role switching.

---
bod