Re: [PATCH V6 06/14] perf/x86/intel: Use switch in intel_pmu_disable/enable_event

["Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>]

On 7/20/2020 12:22 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 07:05:46AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> Many items are checked in the intel_pmu_disable/enable_event. More items
>> will be added later, e.g. perf metrics events.
>>
>> Use switch, which is more efficient, to replace the if-else.
> 
> Perhaps explain how; does this actually generate a jump-table?

As my understanding, some optimizing compilers may compile a switch 
statement into a jump-table. So it depends.

Another advantage of switch statement is to improve the readability of 
the code. I think I missed it in the commit message.

I will change the commit message as below in V7.

"Currently, the if-else is used in the intel_pmu_disable/enable_event to 
check the type of an event. It works well, but with more and more types 
added later, e.g., perf metrics, compared to the switch statement, the 
if-else may impair the readability of the code.

Also, some optimizing compilers may compile a switch statement into a 
jump-table which is more efficient than if-else.

Use switch to replace the if-else in the intel_pmu_disable/enable_event()."


Thanks,
Kan