The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
To: Arnaud Lecomte <contact@arnaud-lcm.com>,
	alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com, haoluo@google.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	sdf@fomichev.me,
	syzbot+c9b724fbb41cf2538b7b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/3] bpf: fix stackmap overflow check in __bpf_get_stackid()
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 15:45:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6e9710a-a5bf-4af9-8c0d-d81d28c3040c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250903234325.30212-1-contact@arnaud-lcm.com>


On 9/3/25 4:43 PM, Arnaud Lecomte wrote:
> Syzkaller reported a KASAN slab-out-of-bounds write in __bpf_get_stackid()
> when copying stack trace data. The issue occurs when the perf trace
>   contains more stack entries than the stack map bucket can hold,
>   leading to an out-of-bounds write in the bucket's data array.
>
> Changes in v2:
>   - Fixed max_depth names across get stack id
>
> Changes in v4:
>   - Removed unnecessary empty line in __bpf_get_stackid
>
> Changs in v6:
>   - Added back trace_len computation in __bpf_get_stackid
>
> Link to v6: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250903135348.97884-1-contact@arnaud-lcm.com/
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+c9b724fbb41cf2538b7b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c9b724fbb41cf2538b7b
> Fixes: ee2a098851bf ("bpf: Adjust BPF stack helper functions to accommodate skip > 0")
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Lecomte <contact@arnaud-lcm.com>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>

For future patches, please keep the "Changes in vX.." at the end of

your commit log and after a "---". IOW, something like


Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>

---

changes in v2:

...

---

kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 8 ++++++++


In this way, the "changes in vXX" part will be removed by git-am.

> ---
>   kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 8 ++++++++
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> index 9f3ae426ddc3..29e05c9ff1bd 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> @@ -369,6 +369,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
>   {
>   	struct perf_event *event = ctx->event;
>   	struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
> +	u32 elem_size, max_depth;
>   	bool kernel, user;
>   	__u64 nr_kernel;
>   	int ret;
> @@ -390,11 +391,15 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
>   		return -EFAULT;
>   
>   	nr_kernel = count_kernel_ip(trace);
> +	elem_size = stack_map_data_size(map);
>   
>   	if (kernel) {
>   		__u64 nr = trace->nr;
>   
>   		trace->nr = nr_kernel;

this trace->nr = is useless.

> +		max_depth =
> +			stack_map_calculate_max_depth(map->value_size, elem_size, flags);
> +		trace->nr = min_t(u32, nr_kernel, max_depth);
>   		ret = __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
>   
>   		/* restore nr */
> @@ -407,6 +412,9 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
>   			return -EFAULT;
>   
>   		flags = (flags & ~BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK) | skip;
> +		max_depth =
> +			stack_map_calculate_max_depth(map->value_size, elem_size, flags);
> +		trace->nr = min_t(u32, trace->nr, max_depth);
>   		ret = __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);

I missed this part earlier. Here we need to restore trace->nr, just like 
we did

in the "if (kernel)" branch.

Thanks,

Song

>   	}
>   	return ret;

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-04 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-03 23:39 [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/3] bpf: refactor max_depth computation in bpf_get_stack() Arnaud Lecomte
2025-09-03 23:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/3] bpf: clean-up bounds checking in __bpf_get_stack Arnaud Lecomte
2025-09-03 23:43   ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/3] bpf: fix stackmap overflow check in __bpf_get_stackid() Arnaud Lecomte
2025-09-04 22:45     ` Song Liu [this message]
2025-09-04 22:53       ` Lecomte, Arnaud
2025-09-04 22:40   ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/3] bpf: clean-up bounds checking in __bpf_get_stack Song Liu
2025-09-04 22:52     ` Lecomte, Arnaud
2025-09-04 22:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/3] bpf: refactor max_depth computation in bpf_get_stack() Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f6e9710a-a5bf-4af9-8c0d-d81d28c3040c@kernel.org \
    --to=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=contact@arnaud-lcm.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=syzbot+c9b724fbb41cf2538b7b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox