Re: [PATCH 13/15] spi: Use trace_invoke_##name() at guarded tracepoint call sites

Mark Brown
2026-03-12T16:54:05Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 521 bytes --]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 11:42:54AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:

> > though not loving the naming here, I'll have a hard time figuring out
> > what the weird call is about next time I look at that code

> Would:

> trace_call__foo()

> Be better?

> Or do you have another name we should use?

Possibly an _unchecked or something? Honestly the suggestion someone
had for _do seemed OK to me. Part of it is that I wouldn't think of
tracepoints as being something that I'd call.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]