Re: [PATCH 06/15] cpufreq: Use trace_invoke_##name() at guarded tracepoint call sites

Viresh Kumar
2026-03-13T06:07:53Z

On 12-03-26, 11:05, Vineeth Pillai (Google) wrote:
> Replace trace_foo() with the new trace_invoke_foo() at sites already
> guarded by trace_foo_enabled(), avoiding a redundant
> static_branch_unlikely() re-evaluation inside the tracepoint.
> trace_invoke_foo() calls the tracepoint callbacks directly without
> utilizing the static branch again.
>
> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vineeth Pillai (Google) <vineeth@bitbyteword.org>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-sonnet-4-6
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 10 +++++-----
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

--
viresh