Re: [PATCH 00/15] tracepoint: Avoid double static_branch evaluation at guarded call sites

Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2026-03-18T10:58:58Z

On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 12:02 PM Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
>
> On 2026-03-17 12:00, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 10:02:32 -0400
> > Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineeth@bitbyteword.org> wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps: call_trace_foo() ?
> >>>
> >> call_trace_foo has one collision with the tracepoint
> >> sched_update_nr_running and a function
> >> call_trace_sched_update_nr_running. I had considered this and later
> >> moved to trace_invoke_foo() because of the collision. But I can rename
> >> call_trace_sched_update_nr_running to something else if call_trace_foo
> >> is the general consensus.
> >
> > OK, then lets go with: trace_call__foo()
> >
> > The double underscore should prevent any name collisions.
> >
> > Does anyone have an objections?
> I'm OK with it.
>
Great thanks! I shall send a v2 with s/trace_invoke_foo/trace_call__foo/ soon.

Thanks,
Vineeth