From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>,
Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge@foundries.io>,
"ulf.hansson@linaro.org" <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"christian.loehle@arm.com" <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Cc: "jinpu.wang@ionos.com" <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
"yibin.ding@unisoc.com" <yibin.ding@unisoc.com>,
"victor.shih@genesyslogic.com.tw"
<victor.shih@genesyslogic.com.tw>,
"asuk4.q@gmail.com" <asuk4.q@gmail.com>,
"hkallweit1@gmail.com" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"yangyingliang@huawei.com" <yangyingliang@huawei.com>,
"yebin10@huawei.com" <yebin10@huawei.com>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: rpmb: do not force a retune before RPMB switch
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 10:03:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8b848a2-ccdf-4a28-8b51-3d1e985be90d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR04MB6575A30D162378E82B4D7DDEFC84A@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On 6/12/23 09:02, Avri Altman wrote:
>>
>> On 4/12/23 17:01, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
>>> Requesting a retune before switching to the RPMB partition has been
>>> observed to cause CRC errors on the RPMB reads (-EILSEQ).
>>
>> There are still 2 concerns:
>> 1) We don't really know the root cause. Have you determined if here are
>> CRC errors in the main partition also?
>> 2) Forcing this on everyone
>>
>> The original idea was that because re-tuning cannot be done in RPMB, the
>> need to re-rune in RPMB could be avoided by always re-tuning before
>> switching to RPMB and then switching straight back. IIRC re-tuning should
>> guarantee at least 4MB more I/O without issue.
> Performance is hardly an issue in the context of RPMB access -
> For most cases it’s a single frame.
Not sure why you bring up performance.
SDHCI spec says:
"To enable inserting the re-tuning procedure during data transfers,
the data length per read/write command shall be limited up to 4MB."
Which implies re-tuning is needed at most every 4MB, so re-tuning
before RPMB switch and switching straight back, means re-tuning
should never be needed in RPMB.
>
> Thanks,
> Avri
>
>>
>> The alternative to dropping re-tuning in this case could be to add a retry loop
>> for MMC_DRV_OP_IOCTL_RPMB if the error is -EILSEQ
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Since RPMB reads can not be retried, the clients would be directly
>>> affected by the errors.
>>>
>>> This commit disables the request prior to RPMB switching while
>>> allowing the pause interface to still request a retune before the
>>> pause for other use cases.
>>>
>>> This was verified with the sdhci-of-arasan driver (ZynqMP) configured
>>> for HS200 using two separate eMMC cards (DG4064 and 064GB2). In both
>>> cases, the error was easy to reproduce triggering every few tenths of
>>> reads.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge@foundries.io>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 7 ++++---
>>> drivers/mmc/core/host.h | 2 +-
>>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c index
>>> f9a5cffa64b1..1d69078ad9b2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
>>> @@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_part_switch_pre(struct
>> mmc_card *card,
>>> if (ret)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>> - mmc_retune_pause(card->host);
>>> + mmc_retune_pause(card->host, false);
>>> }
>>>
>>> return ret;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c index
>>> 096093f7be00..a9b95aaa2235 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>>> @@ -119,13 +119,14 @@ void mmc_retune_enable(struct mmc_host
>> *host)
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * Pause re-tuning for a small set of operations. The pause begins
>>> after the
>>> - * next command and after first doing re-tuning.
>>> + * next command and, if retune is set, after first doing re-tuning.
>>> */
>>> -void mmc_retune_pause(struct mmc_host *host)
>>> +void mmc_retune_pause(struct mmc_host *host, bool retune)
>>> {
>>> if (!host->retune_paused) {
>>> host->retune_paused = 1;
>>> - mmc_retune_needed(host);
>>> + if (retune)
>>> + mmc_retune_needed(host);
>>
>> Better to just drop mmc_retune_needed(host);
>>
>>> mmc_retune_hold(host);
>>
>> There is still a small chance that re-tuning is needed anyway in which case it
>> will still be done.
>>
>>> }
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.h b/drivers/mmc/core/host.h index
>>> 48c4952512a5..321776b52270 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.h
>>> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ void mmc_retune_disable(struct mmc_host *host);
>>> void mmc_retune_hold(struct mmc_host *host); void
>>> mmc_retune_release(struct mmc_host *host); int mmc_retune(struct
>>> mmc_host *host); -void mmc_retune_pause(struct mmc_host *host);
>>> +void mmc_retune_pause(struct mmc_host *host, bool retune);
>>> void mmc_retune_unpause(struct mmc_host *host);
>>>
>>> static inline void mmc_retune_clear(struct mmc_host *host)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-11 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-04 15:01 [PATCH] mmc: rpmb: do not force a retune before RPMB switch Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
2023-12-04 16:22 ` Avri Altman
2023-12-04 17:58 ` Avri Altman
2023-12-04 18:14 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2023-12-05 16:10 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2023-12-05 20:12 ` Adrian Hunter
2023-12-05 20:14 ` Adrian Hunter
2023-12-06 7:02 ` Avri Altman
2023-12-06 10:00 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2023-12-11 8:00 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2023-12-11 10:25 ` Adrian Hunter
2023-12-11 11:06 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2023-12-11 11:32 ` Adrian Hunter
2023-12-11 15:05 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2023-12-14 9:15 ` Adrian Hunter
2023-12-14 11:16 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2024-01-02 10:41 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2024-01-02 19:01 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-01-02 22:01 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2024-01-03 8:03 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-01-03 9:20 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2024-01-04 18:34 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-01-05 8:49 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2024-01-05 13:00 ` Michal Simek
2023-12-11 8:03 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2024-01-02 19:02 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-01-03 8:08 ` Adrian Hunter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-12-04 17:22 Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
2023-12-04 17:52 ` Christian Loehle
2023-12-04 18:10 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2023-12-11 16:17 ` Adrian Hunter
2023-12-11 16:55 Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
2024-01-03 8:08 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-01-03 10:35 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8b848a2-ccdf-4a28-8b51-3d1e985be90d@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=Avri.Altman@wdc.com \
--cc=asuk4.q@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jinpu.wang@ionos.com \
--cc=jorge@foundries.io \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=victor.shih@genesyslogic.com.tw \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
--cc=yebin10@huawei.com \
--cc=yibin.ding@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox