The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: Tu Dinh <ngoc-tu.dinh@vates.tech>, Abinash <abinashlalotra@gmail.com>
Cc: sstabellini@kernel.org, oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Abinash Singh <abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] xen/gntdev: reduce stack usage by dynamically allocating gntdev_copy_batch
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:22:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8bde276-9d4e-47d0-9841-fd8724ef5275@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab668ddb-1ea5-4444-95fc-f31469b4f05e@vates.tech>


[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1814 bytes --]

On 03.07.25 00:42, Tu Dinh wrote:
> On 01/07/2025 23:53, Abinash wrote:
>> Hi ,
>>
>> Thanks for pointing that out.
>>
>> I haven’t measured the performance impact yet — my main focus was on
>> getting rid of the stack usage warning triggered by LLVM due to
>> inlining. But you're right, gntdev_ioctl_grant_copy() is on a hot
>> path, and calling kmalloc() there could definitely slow things down,
>> especially under memory pressure.
>>
>> I’ll run some benchmarks to compare the current approach with the
>> dynamic allocation, and also look into alternatives — maybe
>> pre-allocating the struct or limiting inlining instead. If you have
>> any ideas or suggestions on how best to approach this, I’d be happy to
>> hear them.
>>
>> Do you have any suggestions on how to test the performance?
>>
>> Best,
>> Abinash
>>
>>
> 
> Preallocating may work but I'd be wary of synchronization if the
> preallocated struct is shared.
> 
> I'd look at optimizing status[] which should save quite a few bytes.
> 
> Reducing GNTDEV_COPY_BATCH could be a last resort, but that may also
> impact performance.

IMHO the most promising way would be to dynamically allocate the struct, but
don't free it at the end of the ioctl. Instead it could be put into a list
anchored in struct gntdev_priv, so freeing would be done only at close() time.

Synchronization would be minimal (just for taking a free struct from the list
or putting it back again), while memory usage would be basically just as needed,
depending on the number of concurrent threads using the same file descriptor
for the ioctl.

This approach would even allow to raise GNTDEV_COPY_BATCH, maybe resulting even
in a gain of performance.

I'll write a patch implementing the allocation scheme.


Juergen

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3743 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-03  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-29 20:42 [RFC PATCH] xen/gntdev: reduce stack usage by dynamically allocating gntdev_copy_batch Abinash Singh
2025-06-30 10:35 ` Tu Dinh
2025-07-01 21:53   ` Abinash
2025-07-02 22:42     ` Tu Dinh
2025-07-03  5:22       ` Jürgen Groß [this message]
2025-07-03 17:35         ` Christophe JAILLET
2025-07-04  6:05           ` Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f8bde276-9d4e-47d0-9841-fd8724ef5275@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=abinashlalotra@gmail.com \
    --cc=abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ngoc-tu.dinh@vates.tech \
    --cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox