From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
"Maciej Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Anil Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 24/30] x86/resctrl: Add energy/perf choices to rdt boot option
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 15:14:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f95e4868-0f87-4b58-b4a8-4fd18dcbf6ad@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250626164941.106341-25-tony.luck@intel.com>
Hi Tony,
On 6/26/25 9:49 AM, Tony Luck wrote:
> Hardware backed resctrl features are enumerated by X86_FEATURE_*
> flags. These may be overridden by quirks to disable features in the case
> of errata.
>
> Users can use kernel command line options to either disable a feature,
> or to force enable a feature that was disabled by a quirk.
>
> Provide similar functionality for software defined features that do not
> have an X86_FEATURE_* flag.
>
> Unlike other options that are tied to X86_FEATURE_* flags, these must be
> queried by name. Add rdt_is_software_feature_enabled() to check whether
> quirks or kernel command line have disabled a feature. Just like the
> hardware feature options the command line enable overrides quirk disable.
Referring to "Intel Application Energy Telemetry" as a software feature does
not sound right. It is a hardware feature, no? Perhaps just "a hardware feature
that does not have a X86_FEATURE_* flag"? With this rdt_is_software_feature_enabled()
could perhaps just be rdt_is_feature_enabled() (open to other ideas)?
The idea that a "software feature" may have a "quirk" also sounds wrong ...
to me that sounds like a different way of saying a "software bug" and we do not
handle software bugs with quirks. Referring to it as a "software feature" just
does not sound right.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c | 7 +++++
> 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index f1f2c0874da9..4c12159f3ea0 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -6066,7 +6066,7 @@
> rdt= [HW,X86,RDT]
> Turn on/off individual RDT features. List is:
> cmt, mbmtotal, mbmlocal, l3cat, l3cdp, l2cat, l2cdp,
> - mba, smba, bmec.
> + mba, smba, bmec, energy, perf.
> E.g. to turn on cmt and turn off mba use:
> rdt=cmt,!mba
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index e8d2a754bc0c..ee1c6204722e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -169,6 +169,8 @@ void __init intel_rdt_mbm_apply_quirk(void);
>
> void rdt_domain_reconfigure_cdp(struct rdt_resource *r);
>
> +bool rdt_is_software_feature_enabled(char *option);
> +
> bool intel_aet_get_events(void);
> void __exit intel_aet_exit(void);
> int intel_aet_read_event(int domid, int rmid, enum resctrl_event_id evtid,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index f857f92e7b8b..f9f3bc58290e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -791,6 +791,8 @@ enum {
> RDT_FLAG_MBA,
> RDT_FLAG_SMBA,
> RDT_FLAG_BMEC,
> + RDT_FLAG_ENERGY,
> + RDT_FLAG_PERF,
> };
>
> #define RDT_OPT(idx, n, f) \
> @@ -816,6 +818,8 @@ static struct rdt_options rdt_options[] __ro_after_init = {
> RDT_OPT(RDT_FLAG_MBA, "mba", X86_FEATURE_MBA),
> RDT_OPT(RDT_FLAG_SMBA, "smba", X86_FEATURE_SMBA),
> RDT_OPT(RDT_FLAG_BMEC, "bmec", X86_FEATURE_BMEC),
> + RDT_OPT(RDT_FLAG_ENERGY, "energy", 0),
> + RDT_OPT(RDT_FLAG_PERF, "perf", 0),
> };
> #define NUM_RDT_OPTIONS ARRAY_SIZE(rdt_options)
>
> @@ -865,6 +869,32 @@ bool rdt_cpu_has(int flag)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Software options that are not based on X86_FEATURE_* bits.
"Hardware features that do not have X86_FEATURE_* bits"?
> + * There is no "h/w does not support this at all" case.
> + * Assume that the caller has already determined that s/w
(please expand h/w to hardware, s/w to software)
> + * support is present and just needs to check if the option has been
Looking at how this function is used I rather interpret
intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature() as determining that hardware
support is present.
> + * disabled by a quirk that has not been overridden * by a command
(stray *)
> + * line option.
> + */
> +bool rdt_is_software_feature_enabled(char *name)
> +{
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-09 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-26 16:49 [PATCH v6 00/30] x86,fs/resctrl telemetry monitoring Tony Luck
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 01/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Consolidate monitor event descriptions Tony Luck
2025-06-27 21:55 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-07-08 20:52 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 02/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Replace architecture event enabled checks Tony Luck
2025-06-27 22:15 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-07-08 20:52 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 03/30] x86/resctrl: Remove 'rdt_mon_features' global variable Tony Luck
2025-07-08 20:53 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 04/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Prepare for more monitor events Tony Luck
2025-07-08 20:55 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 05/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Improve domain type checking Tony Luck
2025-07-08 21:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 06/30] x86/resctrl: Move L3 initialization out of domain_add_cpu_mon() Tony Luck
2025-07-08 20:56 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 07/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Refactor domain_remove_cpu_mon() ready for new domain types Tony Luck
2025-07-08 20:57 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 08/30] x86/resctrl: Clean up domain_remove_cpu_ctrl() Tony Luck
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 09/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Use struct rdt_domain_hdr instead of struct rdt_mon_domain Tony Luck
2025-07-08 21:04 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 10/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename struct rdt_mon_domain and rdt_hw_mon_domain Tony Luck
2025-07-08 21:06 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 11/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename some L3 specific functions Tony Luck
2025-07-08 21:08 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 12/30] fs/resctrl: Make event details accessible to functions when reading events Tony Luck
2025-07-09 22:12 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 13/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle events that can be read from any CPU Tony Luck
2025-07-08 21:15 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 14/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Support binary fixed point event counters Tony Luck
2025-06-27 21:22 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-06-27 22:28 ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-27 21:49 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-07-08 21:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-09 16:52 ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 15/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Add an architectural hook called for each mount Tony Luck
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 16/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Add and initialize rdt_resource for package scope core monitor Tony Luck
2025-07-08 22:05 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 17/30] x86/resctrl: Discover hardware telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-06-27 18:06 ` Luck, Tony
2025-07-03 18:27 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-03 20:17 ` Luck, Tony
2025-07-03 20:31 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-03 21:11 ` Luck, Tony
2025-07-03 22:00 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-03 23:29 ` Luck, Tony
2025-07-08 23:51 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 18/30] x86/resctrl: Count valid telemetry aggregators per package Tony Luck
2025-07-09 2:20 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-09 18:12 ` Luck, Tony
2025-07-09 22:13 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-09 22:48 ` Luck, Tony
2025-07-09 22:59 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 19/30] x86/resctrl: Complete telemetry event enumeration Tony Luck
2025-07-09 2:38 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 20/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Fill in details of Clearwater Forest events Tony Luck
2025-07-09 3:00 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 21/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Add architectural event pointer Tony Luck
2025-07-09 3:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-09 21:16 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 22/30] x86/resctrl: Read core telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-07-09 15:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-09 21:57 ` Luck, Tony
2025-07-09 22:13 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 23/30] x86/resctrl: Handle domain creation/deletion for RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-07-09 22:13 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 24/30] x86/resctrl: Add energy/perf choices to rdt boot option Tony Luck
2025-07-09 22:14 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 25/30] x86/resctrl: Handle number of RMIDs supported by telemetry resources Tony Luck
2025-07-09 22:17 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 26/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Move RMID initialization to first mount Tony Luck
2025-07-09 22:18 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 27/30] x86/resctrl: Enable RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 28/30] fs/resctrl: Provide interface to create a debugfs info directory Tony Luck
2025-07-09 22:19 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 29/30] x86/resctrl: Add debug info/PERF_PKG_MON/status files Tony Luck
2025-07-09 22:22 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 30/30] x86,fs/resctrl: Update Documentation for package events Tony Luck
2025-07-09 22:24 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-27 0:26 ` [PATCH v6 00/30] x86,fs/resctrl telemetry monitoring Luck, Tony
2025-06-27 18:09 ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-30 17:51 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-30 22:46 ` Luck, Tony
2025-07-08 20:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-03 16:45 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-03 17:22 ` Luck, Tony
2025-07-08 19:08 ` Luck, Tony
2025-07-08 20:49 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-08 22:43 ` Luck, Tony
2025-07-08 23:26 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f95e4868-0f87-4b58-b4a8-4fd18dcbf6ad@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).