Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] cpufreq: Allow arch_freq_get_on_cpu to return an error

Viresh Kumar
2025-01-22T06:12:53Z

On 21-01-25, 16:14, Beata Michalska wrote:
> Theoretically speaking - it should, though what would 0 actually
> represent then ?

0 won't be a failure, that's clear, since errors are represented
differently now. I am not sure what 0 frequency would mean and it can
be left as an architecture specific value, which is a corner case I am
not sure will ever occur.

--
viresh