From: Linjun Bao <meljbao@gmail.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: avoid missing db ring during reset
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 20:01:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa04f3d5-56ff-62bb-0afd-ad94e961ddee@gmail.com> (raw)
During nvme reset, there is a rare case, when user admin cmd such
as smart-log and nvme_admin_create_sq from nvme_setup_io_queues
happen to in the same blk_mq dispatch list, and the user cmd is
the last one. nvme_admin_create_sq is dispatched first in
nvme_queue_rq(), nvme_write_sq_db() is called but immediately
returns without writing the doorbell because it's not masked
"last". The subsequent smart-log ioctl fails fast hitting
nvme_fail_nonready_cmd(), skipping both nvme_sq_copy_cmd() and
nvme_write_sq_db(), so no doorbell write ever occurs. The
nvme_admin_create_sq fails timeout finally.
The proposal is that do not treat user admin cmd during
RECONNECTING as non-ready, through it to the drive, thus no
doorbell missing happens in case above.
Signed-off-by: Linjun Bao <meljbao@gmail.com>
---
drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 3cc79817e4d7..fc550226ed77 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -750,7 +750,8 @@ bool __nvme_check_ready(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct request *rq,
* sequence. until the controller will be LIVE, fail with
* BLK_STS_RESOURCE so that they will be rescheduled.
*/
- if (rq->q == ctrl->admin_q && (req->flags & NVME_REQ_USERCMD))
+ if (rq->q == ctrl->admin_q && (req->flags & NVME_REQ_USERCMD) &&
+ (nvme_ctrl_state(ctrl) != NVME_CTRL_CONNECTING))
return false;
if (ctrl->ops->flags & NVME_F_FABRICS) {
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-25 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-25 12:01 Linjun Bao [this message]
2025-04-25 15:48 ` [PATCH] nvme: avoid missing db ring during reset Keith Busch
2025-04-25 16:35 ` Linjun Bao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa04f3d5-56ff-62bb-0afd-ad94e961ddee@gmail.com \
--to=meljbao@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox