From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758220AbZKYBxf (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:53:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758175AbZKYBxf (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:53:35 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f182.google.com ([209.85.211.182]:41539 "EHLO mail-yw0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758155AbZKYBxe convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:53:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20091124170419.92cb63f6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20091124170419.92cb63f6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> From: Grant Likely Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:53:21 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 080d21e227c7aa5d Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] two new linux-next trees (SPI and devicetree) To: Andrew Morton Cc: dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net, spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Michal Simek Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:54:27 -0700 > Grant Likely wrote: > >> I've made the offer to be SPI >> co-maintainer, > > OK by me.  Don't break anything. I'll do my best. > My current stash: > > > atmel_spi-fix-dma-addr-calculation-for-len-buffer_size.patch > spi-controller-driver-for-designware-spi-core.patch > spi-add-pci-interface-driver-for-designware-spi-core.patch > spi-add-pci-interface-driver-for-designware-spi-core-fix.patch > spi-controller-driver-for-designware-spi-core-fix.patch > spidev-add-proper-section-markers.patch > spidev-use-declare_bitmap-instead-of-declaring-the-array.patch > spidev-use-declare_bitmap-instead-of-declaring-the-array-checkpatch-fixes.patch > spi-drain-mxc-spi-transfer-buffer-when-probing-device.patch > spi_s3c24xx-add-fiq-pseudo-dma-support.patch Since they're already in your tree, do you mind continuing to shepherd these (either merge or drop)? I've gotten a patchwork project set up on kernel.org for the spi mailing list, so I can easily track things from this point on. My gameplan at this point is to try and stay on top of the things that I'm familiar with (mostly powerpc) and depend on other people to ack the rest. I'll pick up anything that a) doesn't look ugly, b) isn't contested, and c) applies. :-) >> but I haven't received any feedback yet from either >> akpm or dbrownell. > > I haven't heard anything from David in over a month. Okay, shall I go ahead and merge my change to MAINTAINERS through my tree too then? g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.