From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756081Ab0BBNzP (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:55:15 -0500 Received: from mail-iw0-f186.google.com ([209.85.223.186]:50148 "EHLO mail-iw0-f186.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755943Ab0BBNzM (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:55:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100202084659.GC5716@linux-sh.org> References: <20100202040628.GH13428@linux-sh.org> <20100202082144.GB5716@linux-sh.org> <20100202084659.GC5716@linux-sh.org> From: Grant Likely Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 06:54:50 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: e709ee7b3c2fa707 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] sh updates for 2.6.33-rc7 To: Paul Mundt Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Paul Mundt wrote: > Ahh.. this is where the confusion came from. The initial version of the > patch was only posted to the sh list, Magnus asked for it to be reposted > to the spi list and I hadn't heard anything about it since then, so I > assumed the poster just disappeared and I just cleaned it up and applied > it by hand. Apparently it was reposted but the sh list was dropped, so I > never saw the updated version. If I had known that it had hit the SPI > list I would have followed up there, I'll be more careful next time now > that I know someone is paying attention :-) :-) Thanks. g.