From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
Dmitri Prokhorov <Dmitry.Prohorov@intel.com>,
Valery Cherepennikov <valery.cherepennikov@intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] perf/core: use rb trees for pinned/flexible groups
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 11:30:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa962d7c-2a6d-bb33-50b0-9d8f0057e8ab@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lgm2xz0m.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
On 29.08.2017 16:51, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> writes:
>
>> Now I figured that not all indexed events are always located under
>> the root with the same cpu, and it depends on the order of insertion
>> e.g. with insertion order 01,02,03,14,15,16 we get this:
>>
>> 02
>> / \
>> 01 14
>> / \
>> 03 15
>> \
>> 16
>>
>> and it is unclear how to iterate cpu==0 part of tree in this case.
>
> Using this example, rb_next() should take you through the nodes in this
> order (assuming you start with 01): 01, 02, 03, 14, etc. So you iterate
> while event->cpu==cpu using rb_next() and you should be fine.
Well, indeed we get the most left leaf (03) in rb_next() for the case above.
>
>> Iterating cpu specific subtree like this:
>>
>> #define for_each_group_event(event, group, cpu, pmu, field) \
>> for (event = rb_entry_safe(group_first(group, cpu, pmu), \
>> typeof(*event), field); \
>> event && event->cpu == cpu && event->pmu == pmu; \
>> event = rb_entry_safe(rb_next(&event->field), \
>> typeof(*event), field))
>
> Afaict, this assumes that you are also ordering on event->pmu, which
> should be reflected in your _less function. And also assuming that
> group_first() is doing the right thing. Can we see the code?
I didn't do ordering by PMU for this patch set. Yet more I implemented
groups_first() like this:
static struct perf_event *
perf_event_groups_first(struct perf_event_groups *groups, int cpu)
{
struct perf_event *node_event = NULL;
struct rb_node *node = NULL;
node = groups->tree.rb_node;
while (node) {
node_event = container_of(node,
struct perf_event, group_node);
if (cpu < node_event->cpu) {
node = node->rb_left;
} else if (cpu > node_event->cpu) {
node = node->rb_right;
} else {
node = node->rb_left;
}
}
return node_event;
}
and it doesn't work as expected for case above with cpu == 1.
I corrected the code above to this:
static struct perf_event *
perf_event_groups_first(struct perf_event_groups *groups, int cpu)
{
struct perf_event *node_event = NULL, *match = NULL;
struct rb_node *node = NULL;
node = groups->tree.rb_node;
while (node) {
node_event = container_of(node,
struct perf_event, group_node);
if (cpu < node_event->cpu) {
node = node->rb_left;
} else if (cpu > node_event->cpu) {
node = node->rb_right;
} else {
match = node_event;
node = node->rb_left;
}
}
return match;
}
but now struggling with silent oopses which I guess are not
related to multiplexing at all.
Please look at v8 for a while. It addresses your comments for v7.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Alex
>
Thanks,
Alexey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-30 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-02 8:11 [PATCH v6 0/3] perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process profiling of STREAM benchmark on Intel Xeon Phi Alexey Budankov
2017-08-02 8:13 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] perf/core: use rb trees for pinned/flexible groups Alexey Budankov
2017-08-03 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 20:30 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 14:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 7:17 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-07 8:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 15:32 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-07 15:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 16:27 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-07 16:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 17:39 ` Andi Kleen
2017-08-07 18:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 18:13 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-15 17:28 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-23 13:39 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-23 14:18 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-29 13:51 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-30 8:30 ` Alexey Budankov [this message]
2017-08-30 10:18 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-30 10:30 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-30 11:13 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-30 11:16 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-31 10:12 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-31 10:12 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 15:22 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-02 8:15 ` [PATCH v6 2/3]: perf/core: use context tstamp_data for skipped events on mux interrupt Alexey Budankov
2017-08-03 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 14:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 15:58 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 15:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 18:47 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-04 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-04 14:25 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 14:23 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-10 15:57 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-22 20:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-23 8:54 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-31 17:18 ` [RFC][PATCH] perf: Rewrite enabled/running timekeeping Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-31 19:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2017-09-05 7:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2017-09-05 9:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 10:45 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-01 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 11:17 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-01 12:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 21:03 ` Vince Weaver
2017-09-04 10:46 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-04 12:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-04 14:56 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-04 15:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-04 15:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 10:17 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-05 11:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-11 6:55 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-05 12:06 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-05 12:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 16:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-06 13:48 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-08 8:47 ` Alexey Budankov
2018-03-12 17:43 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/cor: Use RB trees for pinned/flexible groups tip-bot for Alexey Budankov
2017-08-02 8:16 ` [PATCH v6 3/3]: perf/core: add mux switch to skip to the current CPU's events list on mux interrupt Alexey Budankov
2017-08-18 5:17 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process profiling of STREAM benchmark on Intel Xeon Phi Alexey Budankov
2017-08-18 5:21 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] perf/core: use rb trees for pinned/flexible groups Alexey Budankov
2017-08-23 11:17 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-23 17:23 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-18 5:22 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] perf/core: add mux switch to skip to the current CPU's events list on mux interrupt Alexey Budankov
2017-08-23 11:54 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-23 18:12 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-22 20:21 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process profiling of STREAM benchmark on Intel Xeon Phi Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-23 8:54 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-31 10:12 ` Alexey Budankov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa962d7c-2a6d-bb33-50b0-9d8f0057e8ab@linux.intel.com \
--to=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Dmitry.Prohorov@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davidcc@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=valery.cherepennikov@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox