From: Purva Yeshi <purvayeshi550@gmail.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Cc: peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] char: tpm: tpm-buf: Fix uninitialized return values in read helpers
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:12:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fab2bb2d-a78e-4130-a5fd-bf07430210c7@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <t2ri7facyvtmt6rx6xwcjos7rgtyiln7cywl2gt4effgukeejc@f3ml4apdh4zs>
On 10/04/25 13:21, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 09:14:58AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 02:25:36AM +0530, Purva Yeshi wrote:
>>> Fix Smatch-detected error:
>>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-buf.c:208 tpm_buf_read_u8() error:
>>> uninitialized symbol 'value'.
>>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-buf.c:225 tpm_buf_read_u16() error:
>>> uninitialized symbol 'value'.
>>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-buf.c:242 tpm_buf_read_u32() error:
>>> uninitialized symbol 'value'.
>>>
>>> Call tpm_buf_read() to populate value but do not check its return
>>> status. If the read fails, value remains uninitialized, causing
>>> undefined behavior when returned or processed.
>>>
>>> Initialize value to zero to ensure a defined return even if
>>> tpm_buf_read() fails, avoiding undefined behavior from using
>>> an uninitialized variable.
>>
>> How does tpm_buf_read() fail?
>
> If TPM_BUF_BOUNDARY_ERROR is set (or we are setting it), we are
> effectively returning random stack bytes to the caller.
> Could this be a problem?
>
> If it is, maybe instead of this patch, we could set `*output` to zero in
> the error path of tpm_buf_read(). Or return an error from tpm_buf_read()
> so callers can return 0 or whatever they want.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
Hi Jarkko, Stefano,
Thank you for the review.
I've revisited the issue and updated the implementation of
tpm_buf_read() to zero out the *output buffer in the error paths,
instead of initializing the return value in each caller.
static void tpm_buf_read(struct tpm_buf *buf, off_t *offset, size_t
count, void *output)
{
off_t next_offset;
/* Return silently if overflow has already happened. */
if (buf->flags & TPM_BUF_BOUNDARY_ERROR) {
memset(output, 0, count);
return;
}
next_offset = *offset + count;
if (next_offset > buf->length) {
WARN(1, "tpm_buf: read out of boundary\n");
buf->flags |= TPM_BUF_BOUNDARY_ERROR;
memset(output, 0, count);
return;
}
memcpy(output, &buf->data[*offset], count);
*offset = next_offset;
}
This approach ensures that output is always zeroed when the read fails,
which avoids returning uninitialized stack values from the helper
functions like tpm_buf_read_u8(), tpm_buf_read_u16(), and
tpm_buf_read_u32().
Does this solution look acceptable for the next version of the patch?
Best regards,
Purva Yeshi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-10 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-09 20:55 [PATCH] char: tpm: tpm-buf: Fix uninitialized return values in read helpers Purva Yeshi
2025-04-10 6:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-04-10 7:51 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-04-10 8:42 ` Purva Yeshi [this message]
2025-04-10 8:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-04-10 8:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-04-10 9:46 ` Purva Yeshi
2025-04-10 8:54 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-04-10 9:44 ` Purva Yeshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fab2bb2d-a78e-4130-a5fd-bf07430210c7@gmail.com \
--to=purvayeshi550@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox