From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EB0C23BCE4 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 14:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743603302; cv=none; b=oTgR8Im3Vk29B+s5+rcvtdzGqepAsjNzV6Hl/3gS9cJabQB2VEhNZarJ+u1csafx77B2l4oxQ3Y25HNCbjN9eIJsiHvETMRaXyd0xXLfDiYkvd+LmuPLlYu1stkJ1iWv0u6mVtkeTmkE3/E2vAH4U5h4FA6eTMbl5A3v9qSCJmo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743603302; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RekemI21winZSkN/4ZTNVhN87O5VbRFw+71Y2jqcSSo=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=pmcgQHYXiOxczXi0ME72oSg8thVG5EVinXrwdKCYXtT71dcvJjmePMCpVPpP9G2ZaUIo+3MKUN8UlCH5MNfnobJQqLkNo2JxIYqDw8PRS7abuPZRvxnhH/2HDk212+gaS566zBzPorOi55yav0bUL3y0tWgCjekghQwpOLbHv6o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4ZSRcR295Sz6D94P; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 22:11:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3892A1407DC; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 22:14:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 16:14:58 +0200 Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.71]) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.71]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.039; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 16:14:58 +0200 From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi To: Sudeep Holla CC: "kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "oliver.upton@linux.dev" , "maz@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "lpieralisi@kernel.org" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nichen@iscas.ac.cn" Subject: RE: [PATCH] smccc/kvm_guest: Remove the accidental semicolon Thread-Topic: [PATCH] smccc/kvm_guest: Remove the accidental semicolon Thread-Index: AQHbo9Xb1Qaum+PVw0qFOb1Na1wSkbOQRVEAgAAki3A= Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 14:14:57 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20250402134401.146156-1-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> <20250402-independent-hyrax-of-honor-4515fb@sudeepholla> In-Reply-To: <20250402-independent-hyrax-of-honor-4515fb@sudeepholla> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 > -----Original Message----- > From: Sudeep Holla > Sent: Wednesday, April 2, 2025 2:58 PM > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi > Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > oliver.upton@linux.dev; maz@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com; > lpieralisi@kernel.org; catalin.marinas@arm.com; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] smccc/kvm_guest: Remove the accidental semicolon >=20 > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 02:44:01PM +0100, Shameer Kolothum wrote: > > Fixes cocci reported warning:Unneeded semicolon > > >=20 > There was similar patch on the list [1] few days ago. Ah.. I missed that. Please take that. >=20 > > Fixes: 86edf6bdcf05 ("smccc/kvm_guest: Enable errata based on > > implementation CPUs") >=20 > ^^^ Is this really necessary as they get backported as well ? Actually I was of two minds on this. Not sure. >=20 > Since, KVM maintainers are in cc-ed, let me know if you guys want to pick > this ? Else I can send it as part of my firmware (ffa/scmi) fixes. Thanks, Shameer