From: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: fsl: qe: remove unused function
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:56:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fafbfcb2-e9d7-4992-a104-1523039807f9@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76468b5b-0eb0-8772-b7b5-21bb708aa053@csgroup.eu>
On 2021/4/16 15:06, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 16/04/2021 à 08:57, Daniel Axtens a écrit :
>> Hi Jiapeng,
>>
>>> Fix the following clang warning:
>
> You are not fixing a warning, you are removing a function in order to
> fix a warning ...
>
>>>
>>> drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_ic.c:234:29: warning: unused function
>>> 'qe_ic_from_irq' [-Wunused-function].
>
> Would be wise to tell that the last users of the function where removed
> by commit d7c2878cfcfa ("soc: fsl: qe: remove unused qe_ic_set_*
> functions")
>
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/d7c2878cfcfa
>
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_ic.c | 5 -----
>>> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_ic.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_ic.c
>>> index 0390af9..b573712 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_ic.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_ic.c
>>> @@ -231,11 +231,6 @@ static inline void qe_ic_write(__be32 __iomem
>>> *base, unsigned int reg,
>>> qe_iowrite32be(value, base + (reg >> 2));
>>> }
>>> -static inline struct qe_ic *qe_ic_from_irq(unsigned int virq)
>>> -{
>>> - return irq_get_chip_data(virq);
>>> -}
>>
>> This seems good to me.
>>
>> * We know that this function can't be called directly from outside the
>> file, because it is static.
>>
>> * The function address isn't used as a function pointer anywhere, so
>> that means it can't be called from outside the file that way (also
>> it's inline, which would make using a function pointer unwise!)
>>
>> * There's no obvious macros in that file that might construct the name
>> of the function in a way that is hidden from grep.
>>
>> All in all, I am fairly confident that the function is indeed not used.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Daniel
>>
>>> -
>>> static inline struct qe_ic *qe_ic_from_irq_data(struct irq_data *d)
>>> {
>>> return irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>>> --
>>> 1.8.3.1
Hi,
I will follow the advice and send V2 later.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-21 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-15 8:34 [PATCH] soc: fsl: qe: remove unused function Jiapeng Chong
2021-04-16 6:57 ` Daniel Axtens
2021-04-16 7:06 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-04-21 7:56 ` Jiapeng Chong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fafbfcb2-e9d7-4992-a104-1523039807f9@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox