public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vjitta@codeaurora.org
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org,
	tkjos@android.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arve@android.com, maco@android.com,
	sumit.semwal@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ion: Consider ion pool pages as indirectly reclaimable
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:40:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb3f0974e9e83b33e7eac267aeecf130@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8618859b-06f9-39a7-80a9-af36cf9faf9f@redhat.com>

On 2018-04-25 21:17, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 04/24/2018 08:43 PM, vjitta@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> From: Vijayanand Jitta <vjitta@codeaurora.org>
>> 
>> An issue is observed where mallocs are failing due to overcommit 
>> failure.
>> The failure happens when there is high ION page pool since ION page
>> pool is not considered reclaimable by the overcommit calculation code.
>> This change considers ion pool pages as indirectly reclaimable and 
>> thus
>> accounted as available memory in the overcommit calculation.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vijayanand Jitta <vjitta@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_page_pool.c | 5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_page_pool.c 
>> b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_page_pool.c
>> index db8f614..9bc56eb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_page_pool.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_page_pool.c
>> @@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ static void ion_page_pool_add(struct ion_page_pool 
>> *pool, struct page *page)
>>   		list_add_tail(&page->lru, &pool->low_items);
>>   		pool->low_count++;
>>   	}
>> +
>> +	mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page), 
>> NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES,
>> +			    (1 << (PAGE_SHIFT + pool->order)));
>>   	mutex_unlock(&pool->mutex);
>>   }
>>   @@ -50,6 +53,8 @@ static struct page *ion_page_pool_remove(struct 
>> ion_page_pool *pool, bool high)
>>   	}
>>     	list_del(&page->lru);
>> +	mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page), 
>> NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES,
>> +			    -(1 << (PAGE_SHIFT + pool->order)));
>>   	return page;
>>   }
>> 
> 
> I'm sure this fixes the problem but I don't think we want to
> start throwing page adjustments into Ion. Why isn't this
> memory already considered reclaimable by existing calculations?
> 
> Thanks,
> Laura

You can refer to discussion here https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/5/361 
introducing
NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES for the memory which is not currently 
considered
as reclaimable

Thanks,
Vijay
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-27  5:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-25  3:43 [PATCH] ion: Consider ion pool pages as indirectly reclaimable vjitta
2018-04-25 15:47 ` Laura Abbott
2018-04-27  5:10   ` vjitta [this message]
2018-04-27  9:29     ` vjitta
2018-04-27 21:30       ` Laura Abbott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fb3f0974e9e83b33e7eac267aeecf130@codeaurora.org \
    --to=vjitta@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=arve@android.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maco@android.com \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox