From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jim Harris <jim.harris@samsung.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"pierre.cregut@orange.com" <pierre.cregut@orange.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/IOV: Revert "PCI/IOV: Serialize sysfs sriov_numvfs reads vs writes"
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 11:15:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbe4efac-2ce3-443c-9b49-de207e4ba82f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240211084844.GA805332@unreal>
On 2/11/24 12:48 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 07:20:28PM -0800, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>> On 2/9/24 3:52 PM, Jim Harris wrote:
>>> If an SR-IOV enabled device is held by vfio, and the device is removed,
>>> vfio will hold device lock and notify userspace of the removal. If
>>> userspace reads the sriov_numvfs sysfs entry, that thread will be blocked
>>> since sriov_numvfs_show() also tries to acquire the device lock. If that
>>> same thread is responsible for releasing the device to vfio, it results in
>>> a deadlock.
>>>
>>> The proper way to detect a change to the num_VFs value is to listen for a
>>> sysfs event, not to add a device_lock() on the attribute _show() in the
>>> kernel.
>> Since you are reverting a commit that synchronizes SysFS read
>> /write, please add some comments about why it is not an
>> issue anymore.
> It was never an issue, the idea that sysfs read and write should be serialized by kernel
> is not correct by definition.
What: /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../sriov_numvfs
Date: November 2012
Contact: Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
Description:
This file appears when a physical PCIe device supports SR-IOV.
Userspace applications can read and write to this file to
determine and control the enablement or disablement of Virtual
Functions (VFs) on the physical function (PF). A read of this
file will return the number of VFs that are enabled on this PF.
I am not very clear about the user of this SysFs. But, as per above description,
this sysfs seems to controls the number of VFs. A typical usage is to allow user
to write a value and then read to check the enabled/disabled number of VMs,
right?
If you are not synchronizing, then the value returned may not reflect the actual
number of enabled / disabled VFs. So wont this change affect the existing user
of this SysFS.
>
> Thanks
>
>>> This reverts commit 35ff867b76576e32f34c698ccd11343f7d616204.
>>> Revert had a small conflict, the sprintf() is now changed to sysfs_emit().
>>>
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/ZXJI5+f8bUelVXqu@ubuntu/
>>> Suggested-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <jim.harris@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pci/iov.c | 8 +-------
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
>>> index aaa33e8dc4c9..0ca20cd518d5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
>>> @@ -395,14 +395,8 @@ static ssize_t sriov_numvfs_show(struct device *dev,
>>> char *buf)
>>> {
>>> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>>> - u16 num_vfs;
>>> -
>>> - /* Serialize vs sriov_numvfs_store() so readers see valid num_VFs */
>>> - device_lock(&pdev->dev);
>>> - num_vfs = pdev->sriov->num_VFs;
>>> - device_unlock(&pdev->dev);
>>>
>>> - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", num_vfs);
>>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", pdev->sriov->num_VFs);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>>
>> --
>> Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
>> Linux Kernel Developer
>>
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-11 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20240209235208uscas1p26c658c64cc85711cd3aa6312224164fc@uscas1p2.samsung.com>
2024-02-09 23:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI/IOV: sriov_numvfs bug fixes Jim Harris
2024-02-09 23:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/IOV: Revert "PCI/IOV: Serialize sysfs sriov_numvfs reads vs writes" Jim Harris
2024-02-10 3:20 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-02-11 8:48 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-02-11 19:15 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan [this message]
2024-02-12 9:31 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-02-12 20:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-02-12 22:59 ` Jim Harris
2024-02-13 7:37 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-02-13 9:40 ` pierre.cregut
2024-02-13 14:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-13 7:34 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-02-13 15:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-02-13 17:46 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-02-13 18:00 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-02-13 19:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-02-14 7:16 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-02-14 17:04 ` Jim Harris
2024-02-14 17:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-02-14 22:55 ` Jim Harris
2024-02-09 23:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] pci/iov: fix kobject_uevent() ordering in sriov_enable() Jim Harris
2024-02-10 3:22 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-02-12 15:17 ` Keith Busch
2024-02-12 15:29 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fbe4efac-2ce3-443c-9b49-de207e4ba82f@linux.intel.com \
--to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jim.harris@samsung.com \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre.cregut@orange.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox