From: Manuel Reimer <Manuel.Spam@nurfuerspam.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p?
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:05:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbppo0$rli$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jeodgfu6pz.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> As I would prefer to use the USB device information (idVendor, idProduct)
>> to detect the device, I also tried this one:
>>
>> ATTRS{idVendor}=="0dda", ATTRS{idProduct}=="2005", SUBSYSTEM=="scsi",
>> ACTION=="add", PROGRAM+="/usr/bin/test.sh %b %p"
>>
>> Now this version returns the USB device ID ($NUM-$NUM) to the test script,
>> but the device path (%p) is still OK and still goes down up to the SCSI
>> device ID.
>>
>> Why does %b not return the SCSI device ID in the second rule?
>
> Because ATTRS has matched the USB device, not the SCSI device.
Yes, that's right, but "SUBSYSTEM" matched the SCSI device...
If I use udevinfo, then this tool tells me:
| A rule to match, can be composed by the attributes of the device
| and the attributes from one single parent device.
So I thought, that I've matched the SCSI device now. To prove this, I
just replaced "SUBSYSTEM=="scsi"" with "SUBSYSTEM=="usb"" and removed
the "S" in the "ATTRS" of the above rule, and now, I get the USB-device
in %b (as expected) and the path in %p only goes down up to the USB
device ID.
So, if all rules match for the same device, then %b and %p are both
pointing to this, right, device.
If I try to match, using one of the parent devices (using the "S"
"extension" to the property names) and the device, to match to, itself,
then the two are inconsistent. Then, %b holds the device name of the
parent and %p holds the patch of the device, I want to match.
For me, this looks like a bug, or am I wrong?
Yours
Manuel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-06 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-06 15:33 udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p? Manuel Reimer
2007-09-06 15:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-09-06 21:05 ` Manuel Reimer [this message]
2007-09-06 21:46 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-09-06 21:59 ` Manuel Reimer
2007-09-07 1:03 ` Kay Sievers
2007-09-11 14:11 ` Manuel Reimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='fbppo0$rli$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=manuel.spam@nurfuerspam.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox