From: "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"nicolinc@nvidia.com" <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
"eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"vasant.hegde@amd.com" <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
"jon.grimm@amd.com" <jon.grimm@amd.com>,
"santosh.shukla@amd.com" <santosh.shukla@amd.com>,
"Dhaval.Giani@amd.com" <Dhaval.Giani@amd.com>,
"pandoh@google.com" <pandoh@google.com>,
"loganodell@google.com" <loganodell@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] iommu/amd: Introduce Guest-ID struct amd_iommu_vminfo
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 16:52:05 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc15b460-9e1a-4e68-ad5d-ab1c871c1300@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240105143811.GB50406@nvidia.com>
On 1/5/2024 9:38 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 08:39:56PM +0700, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
>> Hi Kevin
>>
>> On 12/15/2023 2:35 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>>> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 12:02 AM
>>>>
>>>> AMD HW-vIOMMU feature requires IOMMU driver to specify a unique 16-bit
>>>> Guest ID (GID) for each VM. This ID is used to index into various
>>>> data structures for configuring the hardware.
>>>>
>>>> Introduce amd_iommu_vminfo_hash hashtable to store per-vm
>>>> configuration,
>>>> which uses 16-bit GID as a hash key along with helper functions.
>>>>
>>>
>>> somehow it's unclear to me whether this series is only for hw
>>> supporting vf or broader hw supporting nested capability. for
>>> the latter case is GID still necessary?
>>
>> I am restructuring the series and might be moving GID stuff until later when
>> introduce broader hw support for AMD vIOMMU.
>
> I'm hoping you can just skip enabling the viommu features and still
> have nesting? That should be OK right? The SW will manage the
> invalidations.
Correct, the part 1 only add support for nested translation (w/o
HW-vIOMMU feature). So, SW would need to manage the invalidation.
Suravee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-09 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-12 16:01 [RFC PATCH 0/6] iommu/amd: Introduce hardware info reporting and nested translation support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2023-12-12 16:01 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] iommu/amd: Update PASID, GATS, and GLX feature related macros Suravee Suthikulpanit
2023-12-12 16:01 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] iommu/amd: Add support for hw_info for iommu capability query Suravee Suthikulpanit
2023-12-13 13:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-05 13:39 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2023-12-15 7:32 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-01-05 13:40 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2023-12-12 16:01 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] iommu/amd: Introduce Guest-ID struct amd_iommu_vminfo Suravee Suthikulpanit
2023-12-15 7:35 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-01-05 13:39 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2024-01-05 14:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-09 9:52 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee [this message]
2023-12-12 16:01 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] iommufd: Introduce data struct for AMD nested domain allocation Suravee Suthikulpanit
2023-12-13 14:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-15 7:38 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-01-05 13:39 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2023-12-12 16:01 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] iommu/amd: Introduce helper functions to setup GCR3TRPMode Suravee Suthikulpanit
2023-12-13 13:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-15 7:39 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-01-05 13:56 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2023-12-12 16:01 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] iommu/amd: Introduce nested translation support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2023-12-13 13:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-05 13:38 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2024-01-05 14:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-15 7:45 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-01-05 13:39 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2024-01-05 14:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-08 6:49 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc15b460-9e1a-4e68-ad5d-ab1c871c1300@amd.com \
--to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=Dhaval.Giani@amd.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loganodell@google.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=pandoh@google.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox