linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
To: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sachinpb@linux.ibm.com, venkat88@linux.ibm.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, mykolal@fb.com,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
	naveen@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	npiggin@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com, iii@linux.ibm.com,
	shuah@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] powerpc64/bpf: Implement PROBE_MEM32 pseudo instructions
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 13:46:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc16e04e-04b2-433b-aa7c-add2ff3b6483@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250829165135.1273071-2-skb99@linux.ibm.com>



On 29/08/25 10:21 pm, Saket Kumar Bhaskar wrote:
> Add support for [LDX | STX | ST], PROBE_MEM32, [B | H | W | DW]
> instructions.  They are similar to PROBE_MEM instructions with the
> following differences:
> - PROBE_MEM32 supports store.
> - PROBE_MEM32 relies on the verifier to clear upper 32-bit of the
> src/dst register
> - PROBE_MEM32 adds 64-bit kern_vm_start address (which is stored in _R26
> in the prologue). Due to bpf_arena constructions such _R26 + reg +
> off16 access is guaranteed to be within arena virtual range, so no
> address check at run-time.
> - PROBE_MEM32 allows STX and ST. If they fault the store is a nop. When
> LDX faults the destination register is zeroed.
> 
> To support these on powerpc, we do tmp1 = _R26 + src/dst reg and then use
> tmp1 as the new src/dst register. This allows us to reuse most of the
> code for normal [LDX | STX | ST].
> 
> Additionally, bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store() is introduced to emit
> instructions for storing memory values depending on the size (byte,
> halfword, word, doubleword).
> 
> Stack layout is adjusted to introduce a new NVR (_R26) and to make
> BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME quadword aligned (local_tmp_var is increased by
> 8 bytes).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h        |   5 +-
>   arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c   |  10 +-
>   arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c |   2 +-
>   arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 162 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   4 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> index 4c26912c2e3c..2d095a873305 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> @@ -161,9 +161,10 @@ struct codegen_context {
>   	unsigned int seen;
>   	unsigned int idx;
>   	unsigned int stack_size;
> -	int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2];
> +	int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 3];
>   	unsigned int exentry_idx;
>   	unsigned int alt_exit_addr;
> +	u64 arena_vm_start;
>   };
>   
>   #define bpf_to_ppc(r)	(ctx->b2p[r])
> @@ -201,7 +202,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg,
>   
>   int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, int pass,
>   			  struct codegen_context *ctx, int insn_idx,
> -			  int jmp_off, int dst_reg);
> +			  int jmp_off, int dst_reg, u32 code);
>   
>   #endif
>   
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index c0684733e9d6..7d070232159f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
>   
>   	/* Make sure that the stack is quadword aligned. */
>   	cgctx.stack_size = round_up(fp->aux->stack_depth, 16);
> +	cgctx.arena_vm_start = bpf_arena_get_kern_vm_start(fp->aux->arena);
>   
>   	/* Scouting faux-generate pass 0 */
>   	if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, NULL, NULL, &cgctx, addrs, 0, false)) {
> @@ -326,7 +327,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
>    */
>   int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, int pass,
>   			  struct codegen_context *ctx, int insn_idx, int jmp_off,
> -			  int dst_reg)
> +			  int dst_reg, u32 code)
>   {
>   	off_t offset;
>   	unsigned long pc;
> @@ -355,6 +356,9 @@ int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, int pass
>   		(ctx->exentry_idx * BPF_FIXUP_LEN * 4);
>   
>   	fixup[0] = PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg, 0);
> +	if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_ST || BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_STX)
> +		fixup[0] = PPC_RAW_NOP();
> +
>   	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32))
>   		fixup[1] = PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg - 1, 0); /* clear higher 32-bit register too */
>   
> @@ -579,7 +583,7 @@ static void bpf_trampoline_setup_tail_call_cnt(u32 *image, struct codegen_contex
>   {
>   	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64)) {
>   		/* See bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt() */
> -		int tailcallcnt_offset = 6 * 8;
> +		int tailcallcnt_offset = 7 * 8;

Hardcoded offsets at multiple places. Can do with a bit of cleanup.
Unrelated to this patchset though :)

The changes look good to me.

For patches 1 to 4:

Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>

>   
>   		EMIT(PPC_RAW_LL(_R3, _R1, func_frame_offset - tailcallcnt_offset));
>   		EMIT(PPC_RAW_STL(_R3, _R1, -tailcallcnt_offset));
> @@ -594,7 +598,7 @@ static void bpf_trampoline_restore_tail_call_cnt(u32 *image, struct codegen_cont
>   {
>   	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64)) {
>   		/* See bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt() */
> -		int tailcallcnt_offset = 6 * 8;
> +		int tailcallcnt_offset = 7 * 8;
>   
>   		EMIT(PPC_RAW_LL(_R3, _R1, -tailcallcnt_offset));
>   		EMIT(PPC_RAW_STL(_R3, _R1, func_frame_offset - tailcallcnt_offset));
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> index 0aace304dfe1..3087e744fb25 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> @@ -1087,7 +1087,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
>   				}
>   
>   				ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx, insn_idx,
> -							    jmp_off, dst_reg);
> +							    jmp_off, dst_reg, code);
>   				if (ret)
>   					return ret;
>   			}
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> index 025524378443..569619f1b31c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> @@ -25,18 +25,18 @@
>    * with our redzone usage.
>    *
>    *		[	prev sp		] <-------------
> - *		[   nv gpr save area	] 5*8		|
> + *		[   nv gpr save area	] 6*8		|
>    *		[    tail_call_cnt	] 8		|
> - *		[    local_tmp_var	] 16		|
> + *		[    local_tmp_var	] 24		|
>    * fp (r31) -->	[   ebpf stack space	] upto 512	|
>    *		[     frame header	] 32/112	|
>    * sp (r1) --->	[    stack pointer	] --------------
>    */
>   
>   /* for gpr non volatile registers BPG_REG_6 to 10 */
> -#define BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE	(5*8)
> +#define BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE	(6*8)
>   /* for bpf JIT code internal usage */
> -#define BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS	24
> +#define BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS	32
>   /* stack frame excluding BPF stack, ensure this is quadword aligned */
>   #define BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME	(STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE + \
>   				 BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS + BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE)
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>   /* BPF register usage */
>   #define TMP_REG_1	(MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 0)
>   #define TMP_REG_2	(MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 1)
> +#define ARENA_VM_START  (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2)
>   
>   /* BPF to ppc register mappings */
>   void bpf_jit_init_reg_mapping(struct codegen_context *ctx)
> @@ -67,10 +68,12 @@ void bpf_jit_init_reg_mapping(struct codegen_context *ctx)
>   	ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_AX] = _R12;
>   	ctx->b2p[TMP_REG_1] = _R9;
>   	ctx->b2p[TMP_REG_2] = _R10;
> +	/* non volatile register for kern_vm_start address */
> +	ctx->b2p[ARENA_VM_START] = _R26;
>   }
>   
> -/* PPC NVR range -- update this if we ever use NVRs below r27 */
> -#define BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN		_R27
> +/* PPC NVR range -- update this if we ever use NVRs below r26 */
> +#define BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN		_R26
>   
>   static inline bool bpf_has_stack_frame(struct codegen_context *ctx)
>   {
> @@ -89,9 +92,9 @@ static inline bool bpf_has_stack_frame(struct codegen_context *ctx)
>    *		[	prev sp		] <-------------
>    *		[	  ...       	] 		|
>    * sp (r1) --->	[    stack pointer	] --------------
> - *		[   nv gpr save area	] 5*8
> + *		[   nv gpr save area	] 6*8
>    *		[    tail_call_cnt	] 8
> - *		[    local_tmp_var	] 16
> + *		[    local_tmp_var	] 24
>    *		[   unused red zone	] 224
>    */
>   static int bpf_jit_stack_local(struct codegen_context *ctx)
> @@ -99,12 +102,12 @@ static int bpf_jit_stack_local(struct codegen_context *ctx)
>   	if (bpf_has_stack_frame(ctx))
>   		return STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE + ctx->stack_size;
>   	else
> -		return -(BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE + 24);
> +		return -(BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE + 32);
>   }
>   
>   static int bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(struct codegen_context *ctx)
>   {
> -	return bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx) + 16;
> +	return bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx) + 24;
>   }
>   
>   static int bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(struct codegen_context *ctx, int reg)
> @@ -170,10 +173,17 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
>   		if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(i)))
>   			EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(bpf_to_ppc(i), _R1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(i))));
>   
> +	if (ctx->arena_vm_start)
> +		EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START), _R1,
> +				 bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START))));
> +
>   	/* Setup frame pointer to point to the bpf stack area */
>   	if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_FP)))
>   		EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_FP), _R1,
>   				STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE + ctx->stack_size));
> +
> +	if (ctx->arena_vm_start)
> +		PPC_LI64(bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START), ctx->arena_vm_start);
>   }
>   
>   static void bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> @@ -185,6 +195,10 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx
>   		if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(i)))
>   			EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(i), _R1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(i))));
>   
> +	if (ctx->arena_vm_start)
> +		EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START), _R1,
> +				bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START))));
> +
>   	/* Tear down our stack frame */
>   	if (bpf_has_stack_frame(ctx)) {
>   		EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(_R1, _R1, BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME + ctx->stack_size));
> @@ -396,11 +410,11 @@ void bpf_stf_barrier(void);
>   asm (
>   "		.global bpf_stf_barrier		;"
>   "	bpf_stf_barrier:			;"
> -"		std	21,-64(1)		;"
> -"		std	22,-56(1)		;"
> +"		std	21,-80(1)		;"
> +"		std	22,-72(1)		;"
>   "		sync				;"
> -"		ld	21,-64(1)		;"
> -"		ld	22,-56(1)		;"
> +"		ld	21,-80(1)		;"
> +"		ld	22,-72(1)		;"
>   "		ori	31,31,0			;"
>   "		.rept 14			;"
>   "		b	1f			;"
> @@ -409,6 +423,36 @@ asm (
>   "		blr				;"
>   );
>   
> +static int bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store(struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 src_reg, s16 off,
> +					u32 code, u32 *image)
> +{
> +	u32 tmp1_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1);
> +	u32 tmp2_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2);
> +
> +	switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) {
> +	case BPF_B:
> +		EMIT(PPC_RAW_STB(src_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
> +		break;
> +	case BPF_H:
> +		EMIT(PPC_RAW_STH(src_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
> +		break;
> +	case BPF_W:
> +		EMIT(PPC_RAW_STW(src_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
> +		break;
> +	case BPF_DW:
> +		if (off % 4) {
> +			EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp2_reg, off));
> +			EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDX(src_reg, tmp1_reg, tmp2_reg));
> +		} else {
> +			EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(src_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
> +		}
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static int emit_atomic_ld_st(const struct bpf_insn insn, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 *image)
>   {
>   	u32 code = insn.code;
> @@ -960,6 +1004,50 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
>   			}
>   			break;
>   
> +		case BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_B:
> +		case BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_H:
> +		case BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_W:
> +		case BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_DW:
> +
> +			EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START)));
> +
> +			ret = bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store(ctx, src_reg, off, code, image);
> +			if (ret)
> +				return ret;
> +
> +			ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx,
> +						    ctx->idx - 1, 4, -1, code);
> +			if (ret)
> +				return ret;
> +
> +			break;
> +
> +		case BPF_ST | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_B:
> +		case BPF_ST | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_H:
> +		case BPF_ST | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_W:
> +		case BPF_ST | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_DW:
> +
> +			EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START)));
> +
> +			if (BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_W || BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_DW) {
> +				PPC_LI32(tmp2_reg, imm);
> +				src_reg = tmp2_reg;
> +			} else {
> +				EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp2_reg, imm));
> +				src_reg = tmp2_reg;
> +			}
> +
> +			ret = bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store(ctx, src_reg, off, code, image);
> +			if (ret)
> +				return ret;
> +
> +			ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx,
> +						    ctx->idx - 1, 4, -1, code);
> +			if (ret)
> +				return ret;
> +
> +			break;
> +
>   		/*
>   		 * BPF_STX ATOMIC (atomic ops)
>   		 */
> @@ -1112,9 +1200,10 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
>   				 * Check if 'off' is word aligned for BPF_DW, because
>   				 * we might generate two instructions.
>   				 */
> -				if ((BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_DW ||
> -				    (BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_B && BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEMSX)) &&
> -						(off & 3))
> +				if ((BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_DW && (off & 3)) ||
> +				    (BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_B &&
> +				     BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEMSX) ||
> +				    (BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_B && BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_MEMSX))
>   					PPC_JMP((ctx->idx + 3) * 4);
>   				else
>   					PPC_JMP((ctx->idx + 2) * 4);
> @@ -1160,12 +1249,49 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
>   
>   			if (BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) {
>   				ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx,
> -							    ctx->idx - 1, 4, dst_reg);
> +							    ctx->idx - 1, 4, dst_reg, code);
>   				if (ret)
>   					return ret;
>   			}
>   			break;
>   
> +		/* dst = *(u64 *)(ul) (src + ARENA_VM_START + off) */
> +		case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_B:
> +		case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_H:
> +		case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_W:
> +		case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_DW:
> +
> +			EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp1_reg, src_reg, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START)));
> +
> +			switch (size) {
> +			case BPF_B:
> +				EMIT(PPC_RAW_LBZ(dst_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
> +				break;
> +			case BPF_H:
> +				EMIT(PPC_RAW_LHZ(dst_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
> +				break;
> +			case BPF_W:
> +				EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWZ(dst_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
> +				break;
> +			case BPF_DW:
> +				if (off % 4) {
> +					EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp2_reg, off));
> +					EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDX(dst_reg, tmp1_reg, tmp2_reg));
> +				} else {
> +					EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(dst_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
> +				}
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
> +			if (size != BPF_DW && insn_is_zext(&insn[i + 1]))
> +				addrs[++i] = ctx->idx * 4;
> +
> +			ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx,
> +						    ctx->idx - 1, 4, dst_reg, code);
> +			if (ret)
> +				return ret;
> +			break;
> +
>   		/*
>   		 * Doubleword load
>   		 * 16 byte instruction that uses two 'struct bpf_insn'


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-04  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-29 16:51 [bpf-next v2 0/5] powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf arena and arena atomics Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-08-29 16:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] powerpc64/bpf: Implement PROBE_MEM32 pseudo instructions Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-04  8:16   ` Hari Bathini [this message]
2025-08-29 16:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/5] powerpc64/bpf: Implement bpf_addr_space_cast instruction Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-08-29 16:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/5] powerpc64/bpf: Introduce bpf_jit_emit_atomic_ops() to emit atomic instructions Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-08-29 16:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] powerpc64/bpf: Implement PROBE_ATOMIC instructions Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-08-29 16:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] selftests/bpf: Fix arena_spin_lock selftest failure Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-04  8:09   ` Hari Bathini
2025-09-04  8:25     ` Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-04 10:34       ` Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-02 15:33 ` [bpf-next v2 0/5] powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf arena and arena atomics Venkat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fc16e04e-04b2-433b-aa7c-add2ff3b6483@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=sachinpb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skb99@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).