From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262621AbVFWII6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:08:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262792AbVFWIGw (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:06:52 -0400 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.198]:25765 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262383AbVFWGgL convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 02:36:11 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Cv0Vh5dmiJXxOxS+ycxsfTH8D9wiEkCEShdvslrI1eym6Z9R1jEWC3lNkyaXAXTR9FSgeT0kfcB101iSnlGMMcE2pOEky3o9mX7/HCC4K0i85qCFBki8Z/jXp0ZjQiRzD3UQmoCuszrwWCB+yLcN2+X1lDR4JJwXJxc7ZJa9qII= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:36:11 +0900 From: Miles Bader Reply-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git Cc: Miles Bader , Mike Bell , Andrew Morton , Greg KH , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050623062627.GB11638@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050621062926.GB15062@kroah.com> <20050620235403.45bf9613.akpm@osdl.org> <20050621151019.GA19666@kroah.com> <20050623010031.GB17453@mikebell.org> <20050623045959.GB10386@kroah.com> <20050623062627.GB11638@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/23/05, Greg KH wrote: > Not that I know of. If you want to do this, compare the original udev > releases that were around 5kb of code, as the nice features it has today > are stuff that devfs can not support at all. That wouldn't be such an effective tool for convincing people to switch though... :-) "Look this obsolete version is much smaller!" If udev has really bloated up due to whizzy new features, how hard would it be to compile a stripped-down version? [Well I should look at the busybox support somebody mentioned -- perhaps it's exactly that.] -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.