From: Miles Bader <snogglethorpe@gmail.com>
To: Mike Bell <kernel@mikebell.org>, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:38:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc339e4a05062223385fa56c40@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050623063457.GB955@mikebell.org>
On 6/23/05, Mike Bell <kernel@mikebell.org> wrote:
> Greg gave me an "I assume so" estimate that udev was smaller by excluding
> the size of sysfs a while back. If you include sysfs in udev's overhead
> then I believe devfs wins handily, but I haven't done the numbers to
> prove it so my estimate is no better. I'm just basing it on sysfs being
> absolutely huge, in linux-tiny terms.
Is it? I always just sort of assumed that sysfs kernel support would
be more or less equivalent in size to devfs kernel support.
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-23 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-21 6:29 [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git Greg KH
2005-06-21 6:30 ` [PATCH] devfs: Remove devfs from the partition code Greg KH
2005-06-21 6:54 ` [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git Andrew Morton
2005-06-21 13:50 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-06-21 15:10 ` Greg KH
2005-06-21 20:11 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-21 20:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-06-21 21:03 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-21 21:16 ` Greg KH
2005-06-21 21:58 ` J.A. Magallon
2005-06-23 1:00 ` Mike Bell
2005-06-23 1:18 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-23 2:13 ` Bill Gatliff
2005-06-23 4:59 ` Greg KH
2005-06-23 6:14 ` Miles Bader
2005-06-23 6:26 ` Greg KH
2005-06-23 6:36 ` Miles Bader
2005-06-23 7:03 ` Greg KH
2005-06-23 19:54 ` Kay Sievers
2005-06-23 6:34 ` Mike Bell
2005-06-23 6:37 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-23 6:47 ` Mike Bell
2005-06-23 6:51 ` Greg KH
2005-06-23 6:38 ` Miles Bader [this message]
2005-06-23 6:28 ` Mike Bell
2005-06-23 6:48 ` Greg KH
2005-06-23 8:29 ` Mike Bell
2005-06-23 12:58 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-06-24 8:24 ` Greg KH
2005-06-23 15:13 ` Per Liden
2005-07-18 16:36 ` Richard Gooch
2005-07-18 20:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-07-18 22:29 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-07-19 2:51 ` Jim Crilly
2005-06-21 17:35 ` Carsten Otte
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-23 4:08 David Brownell
2005-06-23 6:21 ` Miles Bader
2005-06-23 8:10 ` Russell King
2005-06-23 5:08 David Brownell
2005-06-23 5:22 ` Bill Gatliff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc339e4a05062223385fa56c40@mail.gmail.com \
--to=snogglethorpe@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kernel@mikebell.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox