linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: x86: make pic setup code look like ioapic setup
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:12:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc3fff2f-bcba-882f-ed92-d205dd187b10@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2cca2bc6-2702-0b2f-e744-f86cbdd80ef5@redhat.com>



On 03/01/2017 14:04, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Am 16.12.2016 um 16:10 schrieb Radim Krčmář:
>> We don't treat kvm->arch.vpic specially anymore, so the setup can look
>> like ioapic.  This gets a bit more information out of return values.
>
> This originally saved us from a race condition as far as I can
> reconstruct from the commit history. Think the problem was
> vpic being set but routes not being set up yet.
> 
> commit 71ba994c94a81c37185ef2fb5190844286ba9aca
> Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Date:   Wed Jul 29 12:31:15 2015 +0200
> 
>     KVM: x86: clean/fix memory barriers in irqchip_in_kernel
> 
>     The memory barriers are trying to protect against concurrent RCU-based
>     interrupt injection, but the IRQ routing table is not valid at the time
>     kvm->arch.vpic is written.  Fix this by writing kvm->arch.vpic last.
>     kvm_destroy_pic then need not set kvm->arch.vpic to NULL; modify it
>     to take a struct kvm_pic* and reuse it if the IOAPIC creation fails.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> 
> I assume that this is now fixed via the irqchip_mode, as it is stored
> last? If so, I really like this patch :)

Yes, the previous patch referred to that when it said
"irqchip_in_kernel() tried to save a bit by reusing pic_irqchip()", and
what this commit message means by "not trteating kvm->arch.vpic
specially anymore".

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-03 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-16 15:10 [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: minor irqchip improvements (API change) Radim Krčmář
2016-12-16 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: x86: don't allow kernel irqchip with split irqchip Radim Krčmář
2017-01-03 12:15   ` David Hildenbrand
2016-12-16 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: x86: decouple irqchip_in_kernel() and pic_irqchip() Radim Krčmář
2016-12-16 15:25   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-16 15:44     ` Radim Krčmář
2017-01-03 12:56   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-01-10  5:09     ` Peter Xu
2017-01-10  9:39       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-16 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: x86: make pic setup code look like ioapic setup Radim Krčmář
2017-01-03 13:04   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-01-03 16:12     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-01-04  9:10       ` David Hildenbrand
2016-12-16 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: x86: refactor pic setup in kvm_set_routing_entry Radim Krčmář
2017-01-03 13:05   ` David Hildenbrand
2016-12-16 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: x86: prevent setup of invalid routes Radim Krčmář
2017-01-03 13:06   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-01-10  5:26   ` Peter Xu
2017-01-10  9:43     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-16 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: x86: simplify conditions with split/kernel irqchip Radim Krčmář
2017-01-03 13:20   ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fc3fff2f-bcba-882f-ed92-d205dd187b10@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).