From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51B4F248861; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 06:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.180.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758090186; cv=none; b=k5GECTOtt2o7hBES6f38VK/ralsA0wgb6fpAx9bkEdL6gT+ybI1YqTozS5o0y2sMB0oDilSMoqiuqQnoZGKgxLrBrri4MIljBAoMPruqcDeeD+eXiUUbF7ACgVXMLvHok3sKTPXxDE9FBhqeXi/0DA9vyF35GaZEWWktuxOmrhA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758090186; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Rs+c/vVPVxFus14/jicS7KV9PWjsmmv1oIivk8MfMiI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=HQgMrNVSjyOVeZ7/zhKExdLnLmg4Uq8QOHZ0QGVZem3Zo2BsqjLyCLL3quoIwPjecYLtOhHBa81b414AtKb+NzQpaLKCfquydel6q1Ymq7ull1uJZq6MdCEFfXj+rZLOS0eqybogSJatbOYWcFuZ5BThz8EQVjSbuhZ5rzm9iw8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b=iw+1ptZy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.180.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b="iw+1ptZy" Received: from pps.filterd (m0279872.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 58H5QV1W016245; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 06:22:52 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=qcppdkim1; bh= PV0bRllSrJgBYJQjnvZ+Phhssn54H7w1TTU3TTjh7Xs=; b=iw+1ptZypZp9LXdY 0B19SrICsTgc2Y3+xHOSTHq53fi8Gcvv8P+pP/GaBcsABKVnDsy6t2ALUj4ZHprt p1xfqT3k8O7yPhpL/vvyaLV38lg49F75QUSNcA3/Q23KgE+GUl0CWYiCZIksE46X sT+zjt9UCrmWtVJnUyUH7dqwkigiNC65AegLLObDGIh7rl5W/11xorgzQocURlS1 weYEJ7q3athlaCEQe02jbIxCOlL3/1msS76O/vARuMdC3Lgp6c/3LGmXhfpWpkK0 87+TZ6qxsQ7tGSX6ZaeP0QMEqmBid77lzBXQMZ38/5nZcDFXn7+R2/WBz35fET5B aiRdow== Received: from nalasppmta02.qualcomm.com (Global_NAT1.qualcomm.com [129.46.96.20]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 497fxxh5ny-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 17 Sep 2025 06:22:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nalasex01c.na.qualcomm.com (nalasex01c.na.qualcomm.com [10.47.97.35]) by NALASPPMTA02.qualcomm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTPS id 58H6MowZ018092 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 17 Sep 2025 06:22:50 GMT Received: from [10.206.103.106] (10.80.80.8) by nalasex01c.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.97.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1748.24; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 23:22:44 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 11:52:41 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: qcom-cci: Document qcs8300 compatible To: Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Vikram Sharma CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Ravi Shankar References: <20250912141134.2799078-1-quic_vikramsa@quicinc.com> <20250912141134.2799078-2-quic_vikramsa@quicinc.com> <20250916024858.GA3574831-robh@kernel.org> <373bbb78-2b0c-446c-be97-53b82edeed64@quicinc.com> <49d6c554-e6ed-4c86-8946-be2cdba659d0@oss.qualcomm.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Nihal Kumar Gupta In-Reply-To: <49d6c554-e6ed-4c86-8946-be2cdba659d0@oss.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) To nalasex01c.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.97.35) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUwOTE2MDIwMiBTYWx0ZWRfX8nXMPL614Yff lsRzdA57d3IrdbVicft0uc9b7mhS6zrbvgZIvjDiWMkM8RaTHeV76GETDi+V9PLZh1ecqHOHfRg GLatwjNwStxqvhwOTss9jCwuZlZJ+9LaufJ1mzfW6paR3Dl2JqxCnSSa7mCEM0+Y6geghZNY+i7 a3Ssv6Ln/sLYUkuRCqFK5VQlIwKGYHPPXwftlc1j74gb5pc4XnPh9o3Vo1Rx6sxyH1WHgEBlKWt 4+TJbKiu3ilXD1fhkEZ31OUG3WdG51xfJE2hyXSj03oHbk6cjGsjviW9L/LSvFMj7M7PqwT7Z45 zhOlWGtZIU+D5C83S6YDQJSSxDMG0bUqb5tesntilGjbY+V8PTdJ1PMOS7QTZOvxZau9mUmbnUZ 6/+3y0AO X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=MMFgmNZl c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=68ca53bc cx=c_pps a=ouPCqIW2jiPt+lZRy3xVPw==:117 a=ouPCqIW2jiPt+lZRy3xVPw==:17 a=GEpy-HfZoHoA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=yJojWOMRYYMA:10 a=XobKNSAVkuln2dIsCLwA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: -YWeYURqnfd2valzalzR04FJDFsdegub X-Proofpoint-GUID: -YWeYURqnfd2valzalzR04FJDFsdegub X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1117,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.80.40 definitions=2025-09-16_02,2025-09-16_01,2025-03-28_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2507300000 definitions=main-2509160202 On 16-09-2025 16:41, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>> Wrap commit messages at 72 chars. And explain how it's the same or >>> different from existing SoCs in the commit message. Don't explain the >>> diff. We can read that ourselves. >>> >> SA8775P(Lemans) has 4 CCIs, while QCS8300 (Monaco) has 3 CCI, with the >> only difference being the GPIOs used for SDA/SCL pins. >> >> Currently, the CCI driver probe happens through the "qcom,msm8996-cci" >> compatible string. Could we use the existing SA8775P compatible string >> "qcom,sa8775p-cci" or we should remove it? >> >> Please advise on the preferred approach for upstream compliance. > Try: > > """ > The three instances of CCI found on the QCS8300 are functionally > the same as on a number of existing Qualcomm SoCs. > > Introduce a new SoC-specific compatible, with a common fallback. > """ > ACK, Will address this in next version. > Konrad