From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750956AbdBCPLt (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:11:49 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51640 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750877AbdBCPLq (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:11:46 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen To: Sinan Kaya , Hanjun Guo , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Lorenzo Pieralisi References: <1484744105-53140-1-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Greg KH , Tomasz Nowicki , Ma Jun , Kefeng Wang , Agustin Vega-Frias , huxinwei@huawei.com, yimin@huawei.com, linuxarm@huawei.com, Matthias Brugger , Wei Xu , Ming Lei , Hanjun Guo From: Marc Zyngier Organization: ARM Ltd Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:11:41 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/02/17 14:50, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> From: Hanjun Guo >> >> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction >> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi >> is ready, this patch set add few patches to enable the ACPI platform >> msi support. >> >> For platform device connecting to ITS on arm platform, we have IORT >> table with the named componant node to describe the mappings of paltform >> device and ITS, so we can retrieve the dev id and find its parent >> irqdomain (ITS) from IORT table (simlar with the ACPI ITS support). >> > > I understand that there is a consensus on IORT/SMMUv3 specific pieces > of this series while there is some ongoing work on the MBIgen part in > due to dependency on Agustin's patch vs. ACPI definitions. > > Can we merge the IORT/SMMUv3 specific pieces to 4.11 so that the base > implementation comes in place? Sorry, but I may be missing something. Which IORT/SMMUv3 patches are we talking about? Do you have a pointer to a series? Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...