From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 6.2-rc1
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 10:04:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd143218-d8ba-e6c5-9225-b8e2aee09979@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230106165809.vkz7lr7gi3xce22e@pali>
On 1/6/23 9:58?AM, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> On Thursday 05 January 2023 13:33:11 Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 1/5/23 1:03?PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> So nobody is going to be motivated to do any development in this area,
>>> and the best we can do is probably to just keep it limping along.
>>
>> Indeed...
> ...
>>> There's probably other cruft in pktcdvd that could be removed without
>>> removing the whole driver, but I do get the feeling that it's just
>>> less pain to keep the status quo, and that there isn't really much
>>> motivation for anybody to do anything else.
>>
>> I'm reluctant to touch it outside of changes that are driven by core
>> changes, and of course the motivation to remove it was driven by not
>> wanting to do that either. Any kind of re-architecting of how it works I
>> would not advocate for. It supposedly works well enough that none of the
>> (few) users are reporting issues with it, best to just let it remain
>> like that imho.
>
> Yea, I agree. This code is in state when it is _used_ and not developed
> anymore. Nobody is really motivated to re-architecture or rewrite this
> code. Such work has big probability to break something which currently
> works fine. And because lot of users are on stable/LTS kernel versions,
> it is possible that we would not notice breakage earlier than (lets say)
> in 5 years.
I did sent out the revert this morning, would be great if you can test
6.2-rc3 when it is out. I'm a bit skeptical on the whole devnode front,
and suspect we might need to convert that to disk_name manipulation.
Which would be fine, as we can then drop the devnode reinstate revert as
well going forward. But I need to find a bit of time to look closer at
this part.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-06 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-25 22:07 Linux 6.2-rc1 Linus Torvalds
2022-12-26 19:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-26 20:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-12-26 21:03 ` Kees Cook
2022-12-26 22:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-27 0:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-27 1:32 ` Kees Cook
2022-12-27 5:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-28 3:40 ` Kees Cook
2022-12-28 14:44 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-01-07 0:06 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-12-26 22:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-12-26 21:10 ` Max Filippov
2022-12-26 22:08 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-27 8:29 ` Build regressions/improvements in v6.2-rc1 Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-12-27 8:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-01 1:33 ` Rob Landley
2023-01-01 12:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-04 6:32 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-01-06 15:10 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-06 15:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-06 15:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-17 16:42 ` Calculating array sizes in C - was: " John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-17 17:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-17 17:06 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-17 20:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-17 20:37 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-19 22:11 ` Michael.Karcher
2023-01-20 3:31 ` Rob Landley
2023-01-20 10:53 ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-01-20 18:29 ` Michael.Karcher
2023-01-20 8:49 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-20 19:29 ` Michael Karcher
2023-01-21 21:26 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-06 15:39 ` Alex Deucher
2023-01-04 19:01 ` Linux 6.2-rc1 Pali Rohár
2023-01-04 19:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-04 20:56 ` Pali Rohár
2023-01-04 21:27 ` Pali Rohár
2023-01-04 21:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-04 21:43 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-05 11:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-05 15:26 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-05 17:42 ` Pali Rohár
2023-01-05 17:45 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-05 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-05 19:22 ` Pali Rohár
2023-01-05 19:40 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-05 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-05 20:33 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-06 16:58 ` Pali Rohár
2023-01-06 17:04 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-01-28 19:34 ` pktcdvd Pali Rohár
2023-01-28 19:43 ` pktcdvd Linus Torvalds
2023-01-29 21:53 ` pktcdvd Jens Axboe
2023-01-29 21:55 ` pktcdvd Jens Axboe
2023-01-29 22:21 ` pktcdvd Pali Rohár
2023-01-29 22:34 ` pktcdvd Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fd143218-d8ba-e6c5-9225-b8e2aee09979@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox