From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751111AbdK3Soo (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:44:44 -0500 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:32213 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750761AbdK3Som (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:44:42 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,341,1508828400"; d="scan'208";a="179716353" Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/24] x86/mm: Allow flushing for future ASID switches To: Peter Zijlstra References: <20171127104923.14378-1-mingo@kernel.org> <20171127104923.14378-16-mingo@kernel.org> <20171130154414.aekkjd26p3hxyqwa@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <3ca0bea7-932a-6d91-a9b4-d07045d444f5@linux.intel.com> <20171130161844.v7ynfdggo6g7j5l5@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , "H . Peter Anvin" , Borislav Petkov , Linus Torvalds From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 10:44:40 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171130161844.v7ynfdggo6g7j5l5@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/30/2017 08:18 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 07:51:17AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: >> On 11/30/2017 07:44 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:49:14AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>>> @@ -338,24 +366,23 @@ static inline void __native_flush_tlb_single(unsigned long addr) >>>> >>>> static inline void __flush_tlb_all(void) >>>> { >>>> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PGE)) { >>>> __flush_tlb_global(); >>>> + } else { >>>> __flush_tlb(); >>>> + tlb_flush_shared_nonglobals(); >>> I do however think this one is superfluous; if we do not have PGE we >>> also do not have PCID and every CR3 switch flushes everything. >> >> I tried to sprinkle these around at all the sites that did non-global >> kernel flushes. In the case that it's superfluous !KAISER, it's a noop >> anyway. In the (currently unsupported) case that we *do* need it, well, >> we need it. > > I'm confused. When would we need it there? __flush_tlb() does a flushing CR3 write that flushes the current PCID. If we need other PCIDs flushed, we have to do it via the tlb_flush_shared_nonglobals() mechanism. Does it matter today in practice? Nope, we never have that situation. But, it also doesn't _hurt_ to have that line there in any way.