public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip: sched/core] sched/topology: Compute sd_weight considering cpuset partitions
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 20:48:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd7bbb95-cccb-4211-9383-eab707680180@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a8c125fd-960d-4b35-b640-95a33584eb08@amd.com>

On 3/21/2026 6:13 PM, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> On 3/21/2026 3:15 PM, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
>> So this is what I've found: By default we have:
>>
>>    cpumask_size: 4
>>    struct sched_domain size: 296
>>
>> If I do:
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
>> index a1e1032426dc..f0bebce274f7 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
>> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ struct sched_domain {
>>   	 * by attaching extra space to the end of the structure,
>>   	 * depending on how many CPUs the kernel has booted up with)
>>   	 */
>> -	unsigned long span[];
>> +	unsigned long span[1];
>>   };
>>   
>>   static inline struct cpumask *sched_domain_span(struct sched_domain *sd)
>> ---
>>
>> I still see:
>>
>>    cpumask_size: 4
>>    struct sched_domain size: 296
>>
>> Which means we are overwriting the sd->span during *sd assignment even
>> with the variable length array at the end :-(
>>

Ah, that's right.

> 
> And more evidence - by default we have:
> 
>    sched_domain size: 296
>    offset of sd_span: 292
> 
> sizeof() seems to account some sort of 4-byte padding for the struct which
> pushes the offset of sd->span into the struct size.
> 

In your disassembly for *sd = {...}

mov     r2, #296
mov     r0, fp
mov     r1, #0
...
bl memset  <-- oops!

> To resolve this, we can also do:
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> index a1e1032426dc..48bea2f7f750 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ struct sched_domain {
>   	 * by attaching extra space to the end of the structure,
>   	 * depending on how many CPUs the kernel has booted up with)
>   	 */
> -	unsigned long span[];
> +	unsigned long span[] __aligned(2 * sizeof(int));
>   };
>   
>   static inline struct cpumask *sched_domain_span(struct sched_domain *sd)
> ---
> 
> and the kernel boots fine with the sd_span offset aligned with
> sched_domain struct size:
> 
>    sched_domain size: 296
>    offset of sd_span: 296
> 
> 
> So Peter, which solution do you prefer?
> 
> 1. Doing cpumask_and() after the *sd = { ... } initialization. (or)
> 
> 2. Align sd->span to an 8-byte boundary.
> 

I vote for option 1, as option 2 relies on how the compiler
interprets sizeof() and the offset of each member within
the structure IMO. Initializing the values after *sd = {} seems
safer and more generic, but the decision is up to Peter : )

thanks,
Chenyu

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-21 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-12  4:44 [PATCH v4 0/9] sched/topology: Optimize sd->shared allocation K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12  4:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] sched/topology: Compute sd_weight considering cpuset partitions K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12  9:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12  9:59     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 10:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 10:09         ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18  8:08   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-20 23:58     ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-03-21  3:36       ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21  7:33         ` Chen, Yu C
2026-03-21  7:47           ` Chen, Yu C
2026-03-21  8:59             ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21  9:45               ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21 10:13                 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21 12:48                   ` Chen, Yu C [this message]
2026-03-24  2:54                     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21 14:13                   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-21 15:14                     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-21 16:38       ` [PATCH] sched/topology: Initialize sd_span after assignment to *sd K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-23  9:08         ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-23 17:34           ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-23  9:36         ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-23 13:24           ` Jon Hunter
2026-03-23 15:36           ` Chen, Yu C
2026-03-23 17:24           ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-23 22:41           ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-03-24  9:10           ` [tip: sched/core] sched/topology: Fix sched_domain_span() tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12  4:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] sched/topology: Extract "imb_numa_nr" calculation into a separate helper K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 13:37   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-12 15:42     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12 16:02       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-16  0:18   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-03-16  3:41     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-16  8:24       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-03-16  8:50         ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18  8:08   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12  4:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] sched/topology: Allocate per-CPU sched_domain_shared in s_data K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18  8:08   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12  4:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] sched/topology: Switch to assigning "sd->shared" from s_data K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18  8:08   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12  4:44 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] sched/topology: Remove sched_domain_shared allocation with sd_data K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18  8:08   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12  4:44 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] sched/core: Check for rcu_read_lock_any_held() in idle_get_state() K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12  9:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 10:06     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18  8:08   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12  4:44 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] sched/fair: Remove superfluous rcu_read_lock() in the wakeup path K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-15 23:36   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-03-16  3:19     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18  8:08     ` [tip: sched/core] PM: EM: Switch to rcu_dereference_all() in " tip-bot2 for Dietmar Eggemann
2026-03-18  8:08   ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Remove superfluous rcu_read_lock() in the " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12  4:44 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] sched/fair: Simplify the entry condition for update_idle_cpu_scan() K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18  8:08   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-12  4:44 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] sched/fair: Simplify SIS_UTIL handling in select_idle_cpu() K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-18  8:08   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-16  0:22 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] sched/topology: Optimize sd->shared allocation Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fd7bbb95-cccb-4211-9383-eab707680180@intel.com \
    --to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox