* Re: [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10
[not found] <d74a7768e957e6ce88c27a5bece0c64dff132e24@holm.dev>
@ 2024-07-27 16:28 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-07-27 16:42 ` kevin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) @ 2024-07-27 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kevin, Alex Deucher, Hersen Wu, Wayne Lin
Cc: regressions, stable, LKML, ML dri-devel,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
[adding a few people and lists to the recipients]
Hi! Thx for your rpeort.
On 27.07.24 18:07, kevin@holm.dev wrote:
> Connecting two 4k displays with display port through a lenovo usb-c
> dock (type 40AS) to a Lenovo P14s Gen 2 (type 21A0) results in no
> image on the connected displays.
>
> The CPU in the Lenovo P14s is a 'AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U with Radeon
> Graphics' and it has no discrete GPU.
>
> I first noticed the issue with kernel version '6.10.0-arch1-2'
> provided by arch linux. With the previous kernel version
> '6.9.10.arch1-1' both connected displays worked normally. I reported
> the issue in the arch forums at
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=297999 and was guided to
> do a bisection to find the commit that caused the problem. Through
> testing I identified that the issue is not present in the latest
> kernel directly compiled from the trovalds/linux git repository.
>
> With git bisect I identified 4df96ba66760345471a85ef7bb29e1cd4e956057
That's 4df96ba6676034 ("drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for
mst mode validation") [v6.10-rc1] from Hersen Wu.
Did you try if reverting that commit is possible and might fix the problem?
> as the first bad commit and fa57924c76d995e87ca3533ec60d1d5e55769a27
That's fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function
dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()") [v6.10-post] from Wayne Lin.
> as the first commit that fixed the problem again.
Hmm, the latter commit does not have a fixes tag and might or might not
be to invasive to backport to 6.10. Let's see what the AMD developers say.
> The initial commit only still shows an image on one of the connected
> 4k screens. I have not investigated further to find out at what point
> both displays stopped showing an image.
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10
2024-07-27 16:28 ` [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10 Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
@ 2024-07-27 16:42 ` kevin
2024-07-29 8:16 ` Lin, Wayne
2024-07-30 5:56 ` Lin, Wayne
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: kevin @ 2024-07-27 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux regressions mailing list, Alex Deucher, Hersen Wu,
Wayne Lin
Cc: regressions, stable, LKML, ML dri-devel, amd-gfx
> [adding a few people and lists to the recipients]
>
> Hi! Thx for your rpeort.
>
> On 27.07.24 18:07, kevin@holm.dev wrote:
>
> >
> > Connecting two 4k displays with display port through a lenovo usb-c
> >
> > dock (type 40AS) to a Lenovo P14s Gen 2 (type 21A0) results in no
> >
> > image on the connected displays.
> >
> >
> >
> > The CPU in the Lenovo P14s is a 'AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U with Radeon
> >
> > Graphics' and it has no discrete GPU.
> >
> >
> >
> > I first noticed the issue with kernel version '6.10.0-arch1-2'
> >
> > provided by arch linux. With the previous kernel version
> >
> > '6.9.10.arch1-1' both connected displays worked normally. I reported
> >
> > the issue in the arch forums at
> >
> > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=297999 and was guided to
> >
> > do a bisection to find the commit that caused the problem. Through
> >
> > testing I identified that the issue is not present in the latest
> >
> > kernel directly compiled from the trovalds/linux git repository.
> >
> >
> >
> > With git bisect I identified 4df96ba66760345471a85ef7bb29e1cd4e956057
> >
>
> That's 4df96ba6676034 ("drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for
>
> mst mode validation") [v6.10-rc1] from Hersen Wu.
>
> Did you try if reverting that commit is possible and might fix the problem?
Reverting is not easily possible:
$ git checkout v6.10
[...]
HEAD is now at 0c3836482481 Linux 6.10
$ git revert 4df96ba66760345471a85ef7bb29e1cd4e956057
Auto-merging drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
error: could not revert 4df96ba66760... drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for mst mode validation
I do not know enough to try and solve the conflict myself without breaking more things.
>
> >
> > as the first bad commit and fa57924c76d995e87ca3533ec60d1d5e55769a27
> >
>
> That's fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function
>
> dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()") [v6.10-post] from Wayne Lin.
>
> >
> > as the first commit that fixed the problem again.
> >
>
> Hmm, the latter commit does not have a fixes tag and might or might not
>
> be to invasive to backport to 6.10. Let's see what the AMD developers say.
>
> >
> > The initial commit only still shows an image on one of the connected
> >
> > 4k screens. I have not investigated further to find out at what point
> >
> > both displays stopped showing an image.
> >
>
> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
>
> --
>
> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
>
> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
>
> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10
2024-07-27 16:42 ` kevin
@ 2024-07-29 8:16 ` Lin, Wayne
2024-07-29 8:35 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-07-30 5:56 ` Lin, Wayne
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lin, Wayne @ 2024-07-29 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kevin@holm.dev, Linux regressions mailing list,
Deucher, Alexander, Wu, Hersen
Cc: regressions@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org, LKML,
ML dri-devel, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
[Public]
Hi,
Thanks for the report.
Patch fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()")
is kind of correcting problems causing by commit:
4df96ba6676034 ("drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for mst mode validation")
Sorry if it misses fixes tag and would suggest to backport to fix it. Thanks!
Regards,
Wayne Lin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kevin@holm.dev <kevin@holm.dev>
> Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2024 12:43 AM
> To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>; Deucher,
> Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Wu, Hersen
> <hersenxs.wu@amd.com>; Lin, Wayne <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
> Cc: regressions@lists.linux.dev; stable@vger.kernel.org; LKML <linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org>; ML dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected
> through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10
>
> > [adding a few people and lists to the recipients]
> >
> > Hi! Thx for your rpeort.
> >
> > On 27.07.24 18:07, kevin@holm.dev wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Connecting two 4k displays with display port through a lenovo usb-c
> > >
> > > dock (type 40AS) to a Lenovo P14s Gen 2 (type 21A0) results in no
> > >
> > > image on the connected displays.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The CPU in the Lenovo P14s is a 'AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U with Radeon
> > >
> > > Graphics' and it has no discrete GPU.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I first noticed the issue with kernel version '6.10.0-arch1-2'
> > >
> > > provided by arch linux. With the previous kernel version
> > >
> > > '6.9.10.arch1-1' both connected displays worked normally. I reported
> > >
> > > the issue in the arch forums at
> > >
> > > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=297999 and was guided to
> > >
> > > do a bisection to find the commit that caused the problem. Through
> > >
> > > testing I identified that the issue is not present in the latest
> > >
> > > kernel directly compiled from the trovalds/linux git repository.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > With git bisect I identified
> 4df96ba66760345471a85ef7bb29e1cd4e956057
> > >
> >
> > That's 4df96ba6676034 ("drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for
> >
> > mst mode validation") [v6.10-rc1] from Hersen Wu.
> >
> > Did you try if reverting that commit is possible and might fix the problem?
>
> Reverting is not easily possible:
>
> $ git checkout v6.10
> [...]
> HEAD is now at 0c3836482481 Linux 6.10
>
> $ git revert 4df96ba66760345471a85ef7bb29e1cd4e956057
> Auto-merging
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
> error: could not revert 4df96ba66760... drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel
> encoding for mst mode validation
>
> I do not know enough to try and solve the conflict myself without breaking
> more things.
>
> >
> > >
> > > as the first bad commit and
> fa57924c76d995e87ca3533ec60d1d5e55769a27
> > >
> >
> > That's fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function
> >
> > dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()") [v6.10-post] from Wayne Lin.
> >
> > >
> > > as the first commit that fixed the problem again.
> > >
> >
> > Hmm, the latter commit does not have a fixes tag and might or might not
> >
> > be to invasive to backport to 6.10. Let's see what the AMD developers say.
> >
> > >
> > > The initial commit only still shows an image on one of the connected
> > >
> > > 4k screens. I have not investigated further to find out at what point
> > >
> > > both displays stopped showing an image.
> > >
> >
> > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
> >
> > --
> >
> > Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
> >
> > https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
> >
> > If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10
2024-07-29 8:16 ` Lin, Wayne
@ 2024-07-29 8:35 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-07-29 8:47 ` Christian Heusel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) @ 2024-07-29 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH, Lin, Wayne
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, LKML, ML dri-devel,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Wu, Hersen, Deucher, Alexander,
kevin@holm.dev, Linux regressions mailing list,
stable@vger.kernel.org
[+Greg +stable]
On 29.07.24 10:16, Lin, Wayne wrote:
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> Patch fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()")
> is kind of correcting problems causing by commit:
> 4df96ba6676034 ("drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for mst mode validation")
>
> Sorry if it misses fixes tag and would suggest to backport to fix it. Thanks!
Greg, seem it would be wise to pick up fa57924c76d995 for 6.10.y as
well, despite a lack of Fixes or stable tags.
Ciao, Thorsten
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: kevin@holm.dev <kevin@holm.dev>
>> Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2024 12:43 AM
>> To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>; Deucher,
>> Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Wu, Hersen
>> <hersenxs.wu@amd.com>; Lin, Wayne <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
>> Cc: regressions@lists.linux.dev; stable@vger.kernel.org; LKML <linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org>; ML dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected
>> through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10
>>
>>> [adding a few people and lists to the recipients]
>>>
>>> Hi! Thx for your rpeort.
>>>
>>> On 27.07.24 18:07, kevin@holm.dev wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Connecting two 4k displays with display port through a lenovo usb-c
>>>>
>>>> dock (type 40AS) to a Lenovo P14s Gen 2 (type 21A0) results in no
>>>>
>>>> image on the connected displays.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The CPU in the Lenovo P14s is a 'AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U with Radeon
>>>>
>>>> Graphics' and it has no discrete GPU.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I first noticed the issue with kernel version '6.10.0-arch1-2'
>>>>
>>>> provided by arch linux. With the previous kernel version
>>>>
>>>> '6.9.10.arch1-1' both connected displays worked normally. I reported
>>>>
>>>> the issue in the arch forums at
>>>>
>>>> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=297999 and was guided to
>>>>
>>>> do a bisection to find the commit that caused the problem. Through
>>>>
>>>> testing I identified that the issue is not present in the latest
>>>>
>>>> kernel directly compiled from the trovalds/linux git repository.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> With git bisect I identified
>> 4df96ba66760345471a85ef7bb29e1cd4e956057
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's 4df96ba6676034 ("drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for
>>>
>>> mst mode validation") [v6.10-rc1] from Hersen Wu.
>>>
>>> Did you try if reverting that commit is possible and might fix the problem?
>>
>> Reverting is not easily possible:
>>
>> $ git checkout v6.10
>> [...]
>> HEAD is now at 0c3836482481 Linux 6.10
>>
>> $ git revert 4df96ba66760345471a85ef7bb29e1cd4e956057
>> Auto-merging
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
>> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
>> error: could not revert 4df96ba66760... drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel
>> encoding for mst mode validation
>>
>> I do not know enough to try and solve the conflict myself without breaking
>> more things.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> as the first bad commit and
>> fa57924c76d995e87ca3533ec60d1d5e55769a27
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function
>>>
>>> dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()") [v6.10-post] from Wayne Lin.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> as the first commit that fixed the problem again.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hmm, the latter commit does not have a fixes tag and might or might not
>>>
>>> be to invasive to backport to 6.10. Let's see what the AMD developers say.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The initial commit only still shows an image on one of the connected
>>>>
>>>> 4k screens. I have not investigated further to find out at what point
>>>>
>>>> both displays stopped showing an image.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
>>>
>>> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
>>>
>>> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
>>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10
2024-07-29 8:35 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
@ 2024-07-29 8:47 ` Christian Heusel
2024-07-29 9:15 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Christian Heusel @ 2024-07-29 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux regressions mailing list
Cc: Greg KH, Lin, Wayne, stable@vger.kernel.org, LKML, ML dri-devel,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Wu, Hersen, Deucher, Alexander,
kevin@holm.dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 823 bytes --]
On 24/07/29 10:35AM, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> [+Greg +stable]
>
> On 29.07.24 10:16, Lin, Wayne wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the report.
> >
> > Patch fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()")
> > is kind of correcting problems causing by commit:
> > 4df96ba6676034 ("drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for mst mode validation")
> >
> > Sorry if it misses fixes tag and would suggest to backport to fix it. Thanks!
>
> Greg, seem it would be wise to pick up fa57924c76d995 for 6.10.y as
> well, despite a lack of Fixes or stable tags.
>
> Ciao, Thorsten
The issue is that the fixing commit does not apply to the 6.10 series
without conflict and the offending commit does not revert cleanly
aswell.
Cheers,
Chris
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10
2024-07-29 8:47 ` Christian Heusel
@ 2024-07-29 9:15 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-07-29 13:21 ` kevin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) @ 2024-07-29 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Heusel, Linux regressions mailing list
Cc: Greg KH, Lin, Wayne, stable@vger.kernel.org, LKML, ML dri-devel,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Wu, Hersen, Deucher, Alexander,
kevin@holm.dev
On 29.07.24 10:47, Christian Heusel wrote:
> On 24/07/29 10:35AM, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
>> [+Greg +stable]
>>
>> On 29.07.24 10:16, Lin, Wayne wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the report.
>>>
>>> Patch fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()")
>>> is kind of correcting problems causing by commit:
>>> 4df96ba6676034 ("drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for mst mode validation")
>>>
>>> Sorry if it misses fixes tag and would suggest to backport to fix it. Thanks!
>>
>> Greg, seem it would be wise to pick up fa57924c76d995 for 6.10.y as
>> well, despite a lack of Fixes or stable tags.
>>
>> Ciao, Thorsten
>
> The issue is that the fixing commit does not apply to the 6.10 series
> without conflict and the offending commit does not revert cleanly
> aswell.
Hah, many thx, I should have checked that.
Lin, Wayne: could you maybe help out here and provide something for 6.10.y?
Ciao, Thorsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10
2024-07-29 9:15 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
@ 2024-07-29 13:21 ` kevin
2024-07-30 6:05 ` Lin, Wayne
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: kevin @ 2024-07-29 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux regressions mailing list, Christian Heusel
Cc: Greg KH, Lin, Wayne, stable, LKML, ML dri-devel, amd-gfx,
Wu, Hersen, Deucher, Alexander
July 29, 2024 at 11:15 AM, "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote:
>
> On 29.07.24 10:47, Christian Heusel wrote:
>
> >
> > On 24/07/29 10:35AM, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > [+Greg +stable]
> > >
> > > On 29.07.24 10:16, Lin, Wayne wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for the report.
> >
> > Patch fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()")
> >
> > is kind of correcting problems causing by commit:
> >
> > 4df96ba6676034 ("drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for mst mode validation")
> >
> > Sorry if it misses fixes tag and would suggest to backport to fix it. Thanks!
> >
> > >
> > > Greg, seem it would be wise to pick up fa57924c76d995 for 6.10.y as
> > >
> > > well, despite a lack of Fixes or stable tags.
> > >
> > > Ciao, Thorsten
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > The issue is that the fixing commit does not apply to the 6.10 series
> >
> > without conflict and the offending commit does not revert cleanly
> >
> > aswell.
> >
>
> Hah, many thx, I should have checked that.
>
> Lin, Wayne: could you maybe help out here and provide something for 6.10.y?
>
> Ciao, Thorsten
>
I reverted 4df96ba6676034 from v6.10.2 from the stable/linux git, resolving the conflict by removing everything that git marked as from the current branch and kept everything marked as from before the branch to merge. That resulted in a patch that is fixing the problem on my machine. Since I don't understand what the code is actually doing it might break things on other machines.
From cd1674a469cede83f6b0907f320b6af08c3c8950 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Holm <kevin@holm.dev>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:24:38 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Test patch
---
.../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c | 33 +++----------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
index a5e1a93ddaea..5c555a37e367 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
@@ -1599,7 +1599,7 @@ enum dc_status dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode(
struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector,
struct dc_stream_state *stream)
{
- int pbn, branch_max_throughput_mps = 0;
+ int bpp, pbn, branch_max_throughput_mps = 0;
struct dc_link_settings cur_link_settings;
unsigned int end_to_end_bw_in_kbps = 0;
unsigned int upper_link_bw_in_kbps = 0, down_link_bw_in_kbps = 0;
@@ -1649,34 +1649,11 @@ enum dc_status dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode(
}
}
} else {
- /* Check if mode could be supported within max slot
- * number of current mst link and full_pbn of mst links.
- */
- int pbn_div, slot_num, max_slot_num;
- enum dc_link_encoding_format link_encoding;
- uint32_t stream_kbps =
- dc_bandwidth_in_kbps_from_timing(&stream->timing,
- dc_link_get_highest_encoding_format(stream->link));
-
- pbn = kbps_to_peak_pbn(stream_kbps);
- pbn_div = dm_mst_get_pbn_divider(stream->link);
- slot_num = DIV_ROUND_UP(pbn, pbn_div);
-
- link_encoding = dc_link_get_highest_encoding_format(stream->link);
- if (link_encoding == DC_LINK_ENCODING_DP_8b_10b)
- max_slot_num = 63;
- else if (link_encoding == DC_LINK_ENCODING_DP_128b_132b)
- max_slot_num = 64;
- else {
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Invalid link encoding format\n");
+ /* check if mode could be supported within full_pbn */
+ bpp = convert_dc_color_depth_into_bpc(stream->timing.display_color_depth) * 3;
+ pbn = drm_dp_calc_pbn_mode(stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz / 10, bpp << 4);
+ if (pbn > aconnector->mst_output_port->full_pbn)
return DC_FAIL_BANDWIDTH_VALIDATE;
- }
-
- if (slot_num > max_slot_num ||
- pbn > aconnector->mst_output_port->full_pbn) {
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Mode can not be supported within mst links!");
- return DC_FAIL_BANDWIDTH_VALIDATE;
- }
}
/* check is mst dsc output bandwidth branch_overall_throughput_0_mps */
--
2.45.2
Regards,
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10
2024-07-27 16:42 ` kevin
2024-07-29 8:16 ` Lin, Wayne
@ 2024-07-30 5:56 ` Lin, Wayne
2024-07-30 6:20 ` Greg KH
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lin, Wayne @ 2024-07-30 5:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kevin@holm.dev, Linux regressions mailing list,
Deucher, Alexander, Wu, Hersen
Cc: regressions@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org, LKML,
ML dri-devel, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
[Public]
Hi,
Thanks for the report.
Patch fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()")
is kind of correcting problems causing by commit:
4df96ba6676034 ("drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for mst mode validation")
Sorry if it misses fixes tag and would suggest to backport to fix it. Thanks!
Regards,
Wayne Lin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kevin@holm.dev <kevin@holm.dev>
> Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2024 12:43 AM
> To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>; Deucher,
> Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Wu, Hersen
> <hersenxs.wu@amd.com>; Lin, Wayne <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
> Cc: regressions@lists.linux.dev; stable@vger.kernel.org; LKML <linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org>; ML dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected
> through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10
>
> > [adding a few people and lists to the recipients]
> >
> > Hi! Thx for your rpeort.
> >
> > On 27.07.24 18:07, kevin@holm.dev wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Connecting two 4k displays with display port through a lenovo usb-c
> > >
> > > dock (type 40AS) to a Lenovo P14s Gen 2 (type 21A0) results in no
> > >
> > > image on the connected displays.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The CPU in the Lenovo P14s is a 'AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U with Radeon
> > >
> > > Graphics' and it has no discrete GPU.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I first noticed the issue with kernel version '6.10.0-arch1-2'
> > >
> > > provided by arch linux. With the previous kernel version
> > >
> > > '6.9.10.arch1-1' both connected displays worked normally. I reported
> > >
> > > the issue in the arch forums at
> > >
> > > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=297999 and was guided to
> > >
> > > do a bisection to find the commit that caused the problem. Through
> > >
> > > testing I identified that the issue is not present in the latest
> > >
> > > kernel directly compiled from the trovalds/linux git repository.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > With git bisect I identified
> 4df96ba66760345471a85ef7bb29e1cd4e956057
> > >
> >
> > That's 4df96ba6676034 ("drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for
> >
> > mst mode validation") [v6.10-rc1] from Hersen Wu.
> >
> > Did you try if reverting that commit is possible and might fix the problem?
>
> Reverting is not easily possible:
>
> $ git checkout v6.10
> [...]
> HEAD is now at 0c3836482481 Linux 6.10
>
> $ git revert 4df96ba66760345471a85ef7bb29e1cd4e956057
> Auto-merging
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
> error: could not revert 4df96ba66760... drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel
> encoding for mst mode validation
>
> I do not know enough to try and solve the conflict myself without breaking
> more things.
>
> >
> > >
> > > as the first bad commit and
> fa57924c76d995e87ca3533ec60d1d5e55769a27
> > >
> >
> > That's fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function
> >
> > dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()") [v6.10-post] from Wayne Lin.
> >
> > >
> > > as the first commit that fixed the problem again.
> > >
> >
> > Hmm, the latter commit does not have a fixes tag and might or might not
> >
> > be to invasive to backport to 6.10. Let's see what the AMD developers say.
> >
> > >
> > > The initial commit only still shows an image on one of the connected
> > >
> > > 4k screens. I have not investigated further to find out at what point
> > >
> > > both displays stopped showing an image.
> > >
> >
> > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
> >
> > --
> >
> > Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
> >
> > https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
> >
> > If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10
2024-07-29 13:21 ` kevin
@ 2024-07-30 6:05 ` Lin, Wayne
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lin, Wayne @ 2024-07-30 6:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kevin@holm.dev, Linux regressions mailing list, Christian Heusel
Cc: Greg KH, stable@vger.kernel.org, LKML, ML dri-devel,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Wu, Hersen, Deucher, Alexander
[Public]
Thanks, Kevin.
The revert patch seems correct, but we plan to refactor this function as the following patch
fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()")
I'll make time to provide one. Thanks!
Regards,
Wayne
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kevin@holm.dev <kevin@holm.dev>
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2024 9:22 PM
> To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>; Christian
> Heusel <christian@heusel.eu>
> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>; Lin, Wayne
> <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>; stable@vger.kernel.org; LKML <linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org>; ML dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wu, Hersen <hersenxs.wu@amd.com>;
> Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected
> through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10
>
> July 29, 2024 at 11:15 AM, "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
> <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> > On 29.07.24 10:47, Christian Heusel wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 24/07/29 10:35AM, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > [+Greg +stable]
> > > >
> > > > On 29.07.24 10:16, Lin, Wayne wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the report.
> > >
> > > Patch fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function
> > > dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()")
> > >
> > > is kind of correcting problems causing by commit:
> > >
> > > 4df96ba6676034 ("drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for mst
> > > mode validation")
> > >
> > > Sorry if it misses fixes tag and would suggest to backport to fix it. Thanks!
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Greg, seem it would be wise to pick up fa57924c76d995 for 6.10.y
> > > > as
> > > >
> > > > well, despite a lack of Fixes or stable tags.
> > > >
> > > > Ciao, Thorsten
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The issue is that the fixing commit does not apply to the 6.10
> > > series
> > >
> > > without conflict and the offending commit does not revert cleanly
> > >
> > > aswell.
> > >
> >
> > Hah, many thx, I should have checked that.
> >
> > Lin, Wayne: could you maybe help out here and provide something for
> 6.10.y?
> >
> > Ciao, Thorsten
> >
>
> I reverted 4df96ba6676034 from v6.10.2 from the stable/linux git, resolving
> the conflict by removing everything that git marked as from the current branch
> and kept everything marked as from before the branch to merge. That resulted
> in a patch that is fixing the problem on my machine. Since I don't understand
> what the code is actually doing it might break things on other machines.
>
> From cd1674a469cede83f6b0907f320b6af08c3c8950 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> From: Kevin Holm <kevin@holm.dev>
> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:24:38 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Test patch
>
> ---
> .../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c | 33 +++----------------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
> a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
> index a5e1a93ddaea..5c555a37e367 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
> @@ -1599,7 +1599,7 @@ enum dc_status
> dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode(
> struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector,
> struct dc_stream_state *stream)
> {
> - int pbn, branch_max_throughput_mps = 0;
> + int bpp, pbn, branch_max_throughput_mps = 0;
> struct dc_link_settings cur_link_settings;
> unsigned int end_to_end_bw_in_kbps = 0;
> unsigned int upper_link_bw_in_kbps = 0, down_link_bw_in_kbps = 0; @@ -
> 1649,34 +1649,11 @@ enum dc_status dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode(
> }
> }
> } else {
> - /* Check if mode could be supported within max slot
> - * number of current mst link and full_pbn of mst links.
> - */
> - int pbn_div, slot_num, max_slot_num;
> - enum dc_link_encoding_format link_encoding;
> - uint32_t stream_kbps =
> - dc_bandwidth_in_kbps_from_timing(&stream->timing,
> - dc_link_get_highest_encoding_format(stream->link));
> -
> - pbn = kbps_to_peak_pbn(stream_kbps);
> - pbn_div = dm_mst_get_pbn_divider(stream->link);
> - slot_num = DIV_ROUND_UP(pbn, pbn_div);
> -
> - link_encoding = dc_link_get_highest_encoding_format(stream->link);
> - if (link_encoding == DC_LINK_ENCODING_DP_8b_10b)
> - max_slot_num = 63;
> - else if (link_encoding == DC_LINK_ENCODING_DP_128b_132b)
> - max_slot_num = 64;
> - else {
> - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Invalid link encoding format\n");
> + /* check if mode could be supported within full_pbn */
> + bpp = convert_dc_color_depth_into_bpc(stream-
> >timing.display_color_depth) * 3;
> + pbn = drm_dp_calc_pbn_mode(stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz / 10, bpp
> << 4);
> + if (pbn > aconnector->mst_output_port->full_pbn)
> return DC_FAIL_BANDWIDTH_VALIDATE;
> - }
> -
> - if (slot_num > max_slot_num ||
> - pbn > aconnector->mst_output_port->full_pbn) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Mode can not be supported within mst links!");
> - return DC_FAIL_BANDWIDTH_VALIDATE;
> - }
> }
>
> /* check is mst dsc output bandwidth branch_overall_throughput_0_mps
> */
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
> Regards,
> Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10
2024-07-30 5:56 ` Lin, Wayne
@ 2024-07-30 6:20 ` Greg KH
2024-07-30 9:09 ` Lin, Wayne
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2024-07-30 6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lin, Wayne
Cc: kevin@holm.dev, Linux regressions mailing list,
Deucher, Alexander, Wu, Hersen, stable@vger.kernel.org, LKML,
ML dri-devel, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 05:56:42AM +0000, Lin, Wayne wrote:
> [Public]
>
> Hi,
> Thanks for the report.
>
> Patch fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()")
> is kind of correcting problems causing by commit:
> 4df96ba6676034 ("drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for mst mode validation")
>
> Sorry if it misses fixes tag and would suggest to backport to fix it. Thanks!
Please submit a backported version to the stable@vger.kernel.org list
and we will be glad to consider it.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10
2024-07-30 6:20 ` Greg KH
@ 2024-07-30 9:09 ` Lin, Wayne
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lin, Wayne @ 2024-07-30 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH
Cc: kevin@holm.dev, Linux regressions mailing list,
Deucher, Alexander, Wu, Hersen, stable@vger.kernel.org, LKML,
ML dri-devel, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
[Public]
Thanks, Greg.
Will do.
Regards,
Wayne Lin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2024 2:21 PM
> To: Lin, Wayne <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
> Cc: kevin@holm.dev; Linux regressions mailing list
> <regressions@lists.linux.dev>; Deucher, Alexander
> <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Wu, Hersen <hersenxs.wu@amd.com>;
> stable@vger.kernel.org; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; ML dri-devel
> <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected
> through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 05:56:42AM +0000, Lin, Wayne wrote:
> > [Public]
> >
> > Hi,
> > Thanks for the report.
> >
> > Patch fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function
> > dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()")
> > is kind of correcting problems causing by commit:
> > 4df96ba6676034 ("drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for mst
> > mode validation")
> >
> > Sorry if it misses fixes tag and would suggest to backport to fix it. Thanks!
>
> Please submit a backported version to the stable@vger.kernel.org list and we
> will be glad to consider it.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-07-30 9:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <d74a7768e957e6ce88c27a5bece0c64dff132e24@holm.dev>
2024-07-27 16:28 ` [REGRESSION] No image on 4k display port displays connected through usb-c dock in kernel 6.10 Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-07-27 16:42 ` kevin
2024-07-29 8:16 ` Lin, Wayne
2024-07-29 8:35 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-07-29 8:47 ` Christian Heusel
2024-07-29 9:15 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-07-29 13:21 ` kevin
2024-07-30 6:05 ` Lin, Wayne
2024-07-30 5:56 ` Lin, Wayne
2024-07-30 6:20 ` Greg KH
2024-07-30 9:09 ` Lin, Wayne
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox