From: Aleksa Savic <savicaleksa83@gmail.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net>
Cc: savicaleksa83@gmail.com, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (corsair-psu) Fix failure to load when built-in to kernel
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 17:52:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe16b501-759a-492b-9835-83ebf8761ae8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b2b3f17d-0f86-4d40-a471-f44153efd6fe@roeck-us.net>
On 2023-12-08 16:43:07 GMT+01:00, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 12/8/23 05:57, Wilken Gottwalt wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 14:11:44 +0100
>> Aleksa Savic <savicaleksa83@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2023-12-08 14:07:10 GMT+01:00, Aleksa Savic wrote:
>>>> When built-in to the kernel, the corsair-psu driver fails to register with
>>>> the following message:
>>>>
>>>> "Driver 'corsair-psu' was unable to register with bus_type 'hid'
>>>> because the bus was not initialized."
>>>>
>>>> Fix this by initializing the driver after the HID bus using
>>>> late_initcall(), as hwmon is built before HID.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: d115b51e0e56 ("hwmon: add Corsair PSU HID controller driver")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Aleksa Savic <savicaleksa83@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c b/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c
>>>> index 904890598c11..48831a528965 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c
>>>> @@ -899,7 +899,20 @@ static struct hid_driver corsairpsu_driver = {
>>>> .reset_resume = corsairpsu_resume,
>>>> #endif
>>>> };
>>>> -module_hid_driver(corsairpsu_driver);
>>>> +
>>>> +static int __init corsairpsu_hid_init(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return hid_register_driver(&corsairpsu_driver);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void __exit corsairpsu_hid_exit(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> + hid_unregister_driver(&corsairpsu_driver);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/* When compiled into the kernel, initialize after the hid bus */
>>>> +late_initcall(corsairpsu_hid_init);
>>>> +module_exit(corsairpsu_hid_exit);
>>>> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>>>> MODULE_AUTHOR("Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net>");
>>>
>>>
>>> Woops! Just saw that the same fix was sent yesterday. Please disregard, sorry!
>>>
>>> Aleksa
>>
>> It is fine. I just start to wonder if there was a change in the subsystem. I
>> used the driver as built-in in the past for several months and never had that
>> issue. And now it is a real flood of reports.
>>
>
> Maybe there was a change in the build order, or some subtle change
> in driver registration code. Question though is _when_ this changed.
> It would be great if someone could bisect it. For example, bus registration
> code has been changed significantly in v6.3. I am copying linux-input
> and the hid maintainers for feedback.
The late_initcall() was also needed in 2020. when corsair-cpro was added in
40c3a4454225 ("hwmon: add Corsair Commander Pro driver").
There was also discussion on the list about it:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/3864498.z6qT3ff8q6@marius/
nzxt-smart2 (from the tail of 2021.) also has a comment about the message.
(Just providing references.)
Aleksa
>
> Either case, I now have two patches and at least the first one was actually
> tested, but no Reviewed-by: or Tested-by: for either of them. While that is
> of course a formality, it would still be useful to show that it is not just
> a random change.
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-08 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-08 13:07 [PATCH] hwmon: (corsair-psu) Fix failure to load when built-in to kernel Aleksa Savic
2023-12-08 13:11 ` Aleksa Savic
2023-12-08 13:57 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2023-12-08 15:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-12-08 16:52 ` Aleksa Savic [this message]
2023-12-08 18:34 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe16b501-759a-492b-9835-83ebf8761ae8@gmail.com \
--to=savicaleksa83@gmail.com \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox