Re: [PATCH 7/9] tty: n_gsm: increase gsm_mux unsupported counted where appropriate

["Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>]

On Wed, 5 Apr 2023, D. Starke wrote:

> From: Daniel Starke <daniel.starke@siemens.com>
> 
> The structure gsm_mux contains the 'unsupported' field. However, there is
> currently no place in the code which increases this counter.
> 
> Increase the 'unsupported' statistics counter in the following case:
> - an unsupported frame type has been requested by the peer via parameter
>   negotiation
> - a control frame with an unsupported but known command has been received

So inconsistent/unsupported adaptation doesn't fall under the second 
bullet?

(Please excuse my ignorance, I'm trying to review your patches with 
somewhat limited knowledge about how things work).

-- 
 i.

> Signed-off-by: Daniel Starke <daniel.starke@siemens.com>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> index 317aa67ed169..49cb2dbfa233 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> @@ -1589,6 +1589,7 @@ static int gsm_process_negotiation(struct gsm_mux *gsm, unsigned int addr,
>  		if (debug & DBG_ERRORS)
>  			pr_info("%s unsupported I frame request in PN\n",
>  				__func__);
> +		gsm->unsupported++;
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	default:
>  		if (debug & DBG_ERRORS)
> @@ -1896,6 +1897,8 @@ static void gsm_control_message(struct gsm_mux *gsm, unsigned int command,
>  		/* Optional unsupported commands */
>  	case CMD_RPN:	/* Remote port negotiation */
>  	case CMD_SNC:	/* Service negotiation command */
> +		gsm->unsupported++;
> +		fallthrough;
>  	default:
>  		/* Reply to bad commands with an NSC */
>  		buf[0] = command;
>