From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
irogers@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] perf: Add PERF_EV_CAP_READ_SCOPE
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 11:26:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff22bcc8-98a2-4975-91e8-29740e6dac45@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240906151153.GX4723@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2024-09-06 11:11 a.m., Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 08:16:38AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> Usually, an event can be read from any CPU of the scope. It doesn't need
>> to be read from the advertised CPU.
>>
>> Add a new event cap, PERF_EV_CAP_READ_SCOPE. An event of a PMU with
>> scope can be read from any active CPU in the scope.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/perf_event.h | 3 +++
>> kernel/events/core.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
>> index 1102d5c2be70..1206bc86eb4f 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
>> @@ -633,10 +633,13 @@ typedef void (*perf_overflow_handler_t)(struct perf_event *,
>> * PERF_EV_CAP_SIBLING: An event with this flag must be a group sibling and
>> * cannot be a group leader. If an event with this flag is detached from the
>> * group it is scheduled out and moved into an unrecoverable ERROR state.
>> + * PERF_EV_CAP_READ_SCOPE: A CPU event that can be read from any CPU of the
>> + * PMU scope where it is active.
>> */
>> #define PERF_EV_CAP_SOFTWARE BIT(0)
>> #define PERF_EV_CAP_READ_ACTIVE_PKG BIT(1)
>> #define PERF_EV_CAP_SIBLING BIT(2)
>> +#define PERF_EV_CAP_READ_SCOPE BIT(3)
>>
>> #define SWEVENT_HLIST_BITS 8
>> #define SWEVENT_HLIST_SIZE (1 << SWEVENT_HLIST_BITS)
>> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
>> index 5e1877c4cb4c..c55294f34575 100644
>> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
>> @@ -4463,16 +4463,24 @@ struct perf_read_data {
>> int ret;
>> };
>>
>> +static inline const struct cpumask *perf_scope_cpu_topology_cpumask(unsigned int scope, int cpu);
>> +
>> static int __perf_event_read_cpu(struct perf_event *event, int event_cpu)
>> {
>> + int local_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> u16 local_pkg, event_pkg;
>>
>> if ((unsigned)event_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
>> return event_cpu;
>>
>> - if (event->group_caps & PERF_EV_CAP_READ_ACTIVE_PKG) {
>> - int local_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> + if (event->group_caps & PERF_EV_CAP_READ_SCOPE) {
>> + const struct cpumask *cpumask = perf_scope_cpu_topology_cpumask(event->pmu->scope, event_cpu);
>> +
>> + if (cpumask && cpumask_test_cpu(local_cpu, cpumask))
>> + return local_cpu;
>> + }
>>
>> + if (event->group_caps & PERF_EV_CAP_READ_ACTIVE_PKG) {
>
> I'm guessing the goal is to eventually remove this one, right?
Yes, after I have the uncore cleaned up. It should be able to remove the
PERF_EV_CAP_READ_ACTIVE_PKG.
Thanks,
Kan
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-06 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-02 15:16 [PATCH 0/7] Generic hotplug support for a PMU with a scope kan.liang
2024-08-02 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf: " kan.liang
2024-09-10 9:59 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2024-09-12 10:12 ` Steven Price
2024-09-12 14:53 ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-19 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/7] " Guenter Roeck
2024-09-19 16:28 ` Liang, Kan
2024-10-23 17:09 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-10-23 17:46 ` Liang, Kan
2024-10-23 18:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-08-02 15:16 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf: Add PERF_EV_CAP_READ_SCOPE kan.liang
2024-09-06 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-06 15:26 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2024-09-10 9:59 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2024-08-02 15:16 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf/x86/intel/cstate: Clean up cpumask and hotplug kan.liang
2024-09-10 9:59 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2024-08-02 15:16 ` [PATCH 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Clean up cpumask and hotplug for perfmon kan.liang
2024-09-10 9:59 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2024-08-02 15:16 ` [PATCH 5/7] dmaengine: idxd: " kan.liang
2024-08-05 15:40 ` Dave Jiang
2024-08-05 17:46 ` Fenghua Yu
2024-09-10 9:59 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2024-08-02 15:16 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf/x86/rapl: Move the pmu allocation out of CPU hotplug kan.liang
2024-09-09 9:26 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-09-09 13:02 ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-09 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-09 17:11 ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-10 9:59 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2024-08-02 15:16 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf/x86/rapl: Clean up cpumask and hotplug kan.liang
2024-09-10 9:59 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2024-09-04 12:44 ` [PATCH 0/7] Generic hotplug support for a PMU with a scope Liang, Kan
2024-09-06 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-06 15:30 ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-06 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-06 15:30 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff22bcc8-98a2-4975-91e8-29740e6dac45@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox