From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754629AbYCBIFR (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Mar 2008 03:05:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752191AbYCBIFG (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Mar 2008 03:05:06 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:46612 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750800AbYCBIFF (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Mar 2008 03:05:05 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Gunter Ohrner Subject: Re: Re: 2.6.24 Kernel Soft Lock Up with heavy I/O in dm-crypt Followup-To: gmane.linux.kernel.device-mapper.dm-crypt Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:58:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200802281924.03996.rrs@researchut.com> <20080228232048.51e28c1d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080229184649.GJ1788@agk.fab.redhat.com> <200803010029.18320.rrs@researchut.com> <47C9AEF3.7040507@redhat.com> <47C9AF8F.2050502@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: bras-co-85-197-3-127.westend.de User-Agent: KNode/0.10.5 Cc: dm-crypt@saout.de, dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: dm-crypt@saout.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Gunter Ohrner wrote: > * This patch seems to hurt performance, I got much lower thoughput and the Mh, strange, today I cannot reproduce the performance degradation... There seem to have been some factors in effect during my yesterday's tests which I'm not aware of - anyway, currently throughput is fine while running a 2.6.24.3 kernel with this patch applied. Greetings, Gunter