From: kishore kadiyala <kishorek.kadiyala@gmail.com>
To: Madhusudhan <madhu.cr@ti.com>
Cc: Vimal Singh <vimal.newwork@gmail.com>,
tony@atomide.com, svenkatr@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH-V2] OMAP: Fix for bus width which improves SD card's peformance.
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 12:01:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <g2s7f9d1ffb1003312331o149df218g651c3e4349ac9a77@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <003b01cad0f0$6ea78040$544ff780@am.dhcp.ti.com>
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Madhusudhan <madhu.cr@ti.com> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: kishore kadiyala [mailto:kishorek.kadiyala@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:03 AM
>> To: Vimal Singh
>> Cc: Madhusudhan; tony@atomide.com; svenkatr@ti.com; linux-
>> omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
>> jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH-V2] OMAP: Fix for bus width which improves SD card's
>> peformance.
>>
>> Sorry for that and here's the Updated one.
>>
>> From: Kishore Kadiyala <kishore.kadiyala@ti.com>
>>
>> This patch improves low speeds for SD cards.
>> OMAP-MMC controller's can support maximum bus width of '8'.
>> when bus width is mentioned as "8" in controller data,the SD
>> stack will check whether bus width is "4" and if not it will
>> set bus width to "1" and there by degrading performance.
>> This patch fixes the issue and improves the performance of
>> SD cards.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kishore Kadiyala <kishore.kadiyala@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com>
>> Acked-by: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com>
>>
>> ---
>> In V2 : Appended Signed-off by Venkat and Ack by Madhu
>>
>> Here are my experiment numbers, on a Class 6 SDHC card:
>> Read peformance is increased by 220%
>> Write Performance is increased by 52%
>>
>> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> index 83f0aff..8c97c22 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> @@ -2092,7 +2092,7 @@ static int __init omap_hsmmc_probe(struct
>> MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY;
>>
>> if (mmc_slot(host).wires >= 8)
>> - mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
>> + mmc->caps |= (MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA);
>> else if (mmc_slot(host).wires >= 4)
>> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
>>
> Kishore,
>
> Since this patch is not yet pushed it makes sense to fix the readability
> issue.
>
> Since 8-bit is the max how about:
>
> if (mmc_slot(host).wires == 8)
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
> if (mmc_slot(host).wires == 4)
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
>
Madhu,
In the above snippet, it checks whether wires are 8 or 4 and if not
neither set's capability to "1".
Does it make sense to check whether the wires are 8,4,1 and if not
any[8,4,1] throw error and come out.
Regards,
Kishore
> This would be little easy to read the code.
>
> Can you please repost the patch??
>
> Regards,
> Madhu
>
>> --
>> 1.6.3.3
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-01 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-11 14:20 [PATCH] OMAP: Fix for bus width which improves SD card's peformance kishore kadiyala
2010-02-11 17:34 ` Madhusudhan
2010-03-31 6:07 ` [PATCH-V2] " kishore kadiyala
2010-03-31 6:27 ` Vimal Singh
2010-03-31 7:03 ` kishore kadiyala
2010-03-31 13:11 ` Jarkko Nikula
2010-03-31 16:37 ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-01 6:31 ` kishore kadiyala [this message]
2010-04-01 15:41 ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-05 12:56 ` [PATCH v3] " kishore kadiyala
2010-04-05 16:48 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-04-05 17:19 ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-05 17:43 ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-06 5:00 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-04-06 16:16 ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-06 16:32 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-04-06 16:55 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-04-06 16:57 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-04-06 23:23 ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-06 23:39 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-04-07 0:16 ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-07 0:57 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-04-08 16:57 ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-19 15:36 ` [PATCH v4] " kishore kadiyala
2010-04-19 15:51 ` kishore kadiyala
2010-04-22 0:26 ` Madhusudhan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=g2s7f9d1ffb1003312331o149df218g651c3e4349ac9a77@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kishorek.kadiyala@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madhu.cr@ti.com \
--cc=svenkatr@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vimal.newwork@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).