From: Dirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mmarek@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: Support split debug info v3
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:10:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gh8unjp46q.fsf@quad.gouders.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140723182802.GV18735@two.firstfloor.org> (Andi Kleen's message of "Wed, 23 Jul 2014 20:28:02 +0200")
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> writes:
>> echo time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-gsplit-dwarf
>> time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-gsplit-dwarf
>> echo time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-g
>> time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-g
>> echo time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-gsplit-dwarf
>> time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-gsplit-dwarf
>> echo time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-g
>> time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-g
>> echo time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-gsplit-dwarf
>> time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-gsplit-dwarf
>> echo time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-g
>> time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-g
>>
>> The figures are from last run - but the other runs had compareable times.
>> So in short I see a ~3 seconds speedup - out of 210 seconds.
>> Thats less than I anticipated.
>
> Thanks. How much smaller is it?
>
> Just saving disk space is a good thing.
Hi Andi,
I applied v3 to rc6+ and did the rudimentary tests that I did with
v1, i.e. make menuconfig, make, make clean, git status and have nothing
to report.
For times an sizes I did tests with my system's .config -- prior to each
`make' I did a `make clean':
split-debug:
# time make -j5
...
real 6m21.819s
user 22m48.828s
sys 1m1.804s
# du -sh .
2.6G .
no split-debug:
# time make -j5
...
real 6m40.311s
user 23m0.648s
sys 1m4.592s
# du -sh .
4.3G .
Dirk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-24 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-15 23:16 [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: Support split debug info v3 Andi Kleen
2014-07-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] Kbuild: Add a option to enable dwarf4 Andi Kleen
2014-07-20 19:23 ` Sam Ravnborg
2014-07-20 21:17 ` Andi Kleen
2014-07-20 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: Support split debug info v3 Sam Ravnborg
2014-07-20 21:19 ` Andi Kleen
2014-07-23 18:05 ` Sam Ravnborg
2014-07-23 18:28 ` Andi Kleen
2014-07-24 8:10 ` Dirk Gouders [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-16 22:06 Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=gh8unjp46q.fsf@quad.gouders.net \
--to=dirk@gouders.net \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox