From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752834Ab2ABTck (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jan 2012 14:32:40 -0500 Received: from mail.snarked.org ([67.43.172.250]:10506 "EHLO mail.snarked.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751251Ab2ABTci (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jan 2012 14:32:38 -0500 X-Envelope-From: (mail.snarked.org) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "D. Stussy" Newsgroups: linux.kernel Subject: Re: where to report bugs while bugzilla.kernel.org is down? Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 11:32:38 -0800 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: "D. Stussy" X-No-Archive: Yes X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 X-Priority: 3 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Vlado Plaga" wrote in message news:ieUkW-2mt-5@gated-at.bofh.it... > Stefan Richter s5r6.in-berlin.de> writes: > > > Even when bugzilla.kernel.org comes back, report bugs preferably to > > mailinglists. > > I don't see why that should be better: bugzilla forwards reports to mailing > lists anyway, doesn't it? > > And certainly it is a big advantage to have bugs tracked in bugzilla, which to > me seems more accessible for occasional participation than a mainling list. I > hope the Kernel bugzilla is back soon! Well, I've reported what I found here, but there's so much traffic, I don't think anyone has even read my report (no one has replied to it).